Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32233156›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2020

Implementation of Asthma Management Guidelines and Possible Barriers in Korea.

Eun Jung Jo, Mi Yeong Kim, Sae Hoon Kim, Yong Eun Kwon, Hye Kyung Park, Sang Heon Cho, Yoon Seok Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical inertia in asthma.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eun Jung JoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-6216
Mi Yeong KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2640-6258
Sae Hoon KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-5302
Yong Eun KwonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chosun University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-4030
Hye Kyung ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-2962
Sang Heon ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7644-6469
Yoon Seok ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-0447
Seoul National University · KRPusan National University · KRChosun University · KRInje University Busan Paik Hospital · KR

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare A030001Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere could be a gap between asthma management guidelines and current practice. We evaluated the awareness of and compliance with asthma management guidelines, and the internal and external barriers to compliance, for the first time in Korea.

methodsFrom March to September of 2012, 364 physicians treating asthma patients at primary, secondary, and tertiary teaching hospitals were enrolled. They completed a questionnaire on the awareness of and compliance with asthma management guidelines, and the barriers and alternatives to their implementation.

resultsOf the 364 physicians, 79.1% were men and 56.9% were primary care physicians. The mean age was 40.5 ± 11.2 years. Most of them were aware of asthma management guidelines (89.3%). However, only a portion (11.0%) of them complied with the guidelines for asthma. Pulmonary function tests for diagnosis of asthma were performed by 20.1% of all physicians and 9.2% of primary care physicians, and by 9.9% of all physicians and 5.8% of primary care physicians for monitoring. Physicians stated that 'asthma monitoring' was the most difficult part of the guidelines, followed by 'environmental control and risk factors.' Only 39.6% (31.9% of the primary care physicians) prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as the first-line treatment for persistent asthma. The internal barriers were physician's preference for oral medications, difficulty in use even with inhaler training, and concern over ICS side effects. The external barriers were possible rejection of medical reimbursement by health insurance, refusal by the patient, cost, and a poor environment for teaching the patient how to use the inhaler. Alternatives proposed by physicians to implement asthma management guidelines were to improve medical reimbursement policies and the level of awareness of such guidelines.

conclusionCompliance with the asthma management guidelines, including ICS prescription, is low despite the awareness of the guidelines. It is necessary to develop a strategy to overcome the internal and external barriers.

Indexed as

AsthmaGuideline AdherenceAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDisease ManagementFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Republic of KoreaRespiratory Function TestsAdrenal Cortex HormonesAsthmaBarrierGuidelinesImplementationInhaled Corticosteroid

Identifiers

PMID32233156
PMCPMC7105508
OpenAlexW3006541053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.