Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32233004›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2020

Evaluation of global gene expression in regenerate tissues during Masquelet treatment.

Nishant Gohel, Rafael Senos, Steven A Goldstein, Kurt D Hankenson, Mark E Hake, Andrea I Alford

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Paracrine Influence of Masquelet's Induced Membrane on Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The induced membrane technique in animal models: a systematic review.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2022
    Article
  6. Masquelet's induced membrane technique: Review of current concepts and future directions.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nishant GohelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Rafael SenosDepartment of Morphology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Steven A GoldsteinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kurt D HankensonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mark E HakeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Andrea I AlfordDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0001-8568-7152
University of Michigan · USUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

Structure, Composition, & Histology Core - Core BP30AR069620 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KARL J JEPSEN · 2016 to 2026
$8.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Masquelet induced-membrane (IM) technique is indicated for large segmental bone defects. Attributes of the IM and local milieu that contribute to graft-to-bone union are unknown. Using a rat model, we compared global gene expression profiles in critically sized femoral osteotomies managed using a cement spacer as per Masquelet to those left empty. At the end of the experiment, IM and bone adjacent to the spacer were collected from the Masquelet side. Nonunion tissue in the defect and bone next to the empty defect were collected from the contralateral side. Tissues were subjected to RNA isolation, sequencing, and differential expression analysis. Cell type enrichment analysis suggested the IM and the bone next to the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer were comparatively enriched for osteoblastic genes. The nonunion environment was comparatively enriched for innate and adaptive immune cell markers, but only macrophages were evident in the Masquelet context. iPathwayGuide was utilized to identify cell signaling pathways and protein interaction networks enriched in the Masquelet environment. For IM vs nonunion false-discovery rate correction of P values rendered overall pathway differences nonsignificant, and so only protein interaction networks are presented. For the bone comparison, substantial enrichment of pathways and networks known to contribute to osteogenic mechanisms was revealed. Our results suggest that the PMMA spacer affects the cut bone ends that are in contact with it and at the same time induces the foreign body reaction and formation of the IM. B cells in the empty defect suggest a chronic inflammatory response to a large segmental osteotomy.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsBone and BonesBone TransplantationGene Expression ProfilingMaleOsteotomyProtein Interaction MapsRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleybonefracturegenetics and genomicstrauma

Identifiers

PMID32233004
PMCPMC7494657
OpenAlexW3013788275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.