Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232960›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2020

Adipose depot gene expression and intelectin-1 in the metabolic response to cancer and cachexia.

Janice Miller, Gillian Dreczkowski, Michael I Ramage, Stephen J Wigmore, Iain J Gallagher, Richard J E Skipworth

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Whole-body and adipose tissue metabolic phenotype in cancer patients.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janice MillerClinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Gillian DreczkowskiFaculty of Health Science and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Michael I RamageClinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stephen J WigmoreClinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Iain J GallagherFaculty of Health Science and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Richard J E SkipworthClinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cachexia is a poorly understood metabolic consequence of cancer. During cachexia, different adipose depots demonstrate differential wasting rates. Animal models suggest adipose tissue may be a key driver of muscle wasting through fat-muscle crosstalk, but human studies in this area are lacking. We performed global gene expression profiling of visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) adipose from weight stable and cachectic cancer patients and healthy controls.

methodsCachexia was defined as >2% weight loss plus low computed tomography-muscularity. Biopsies of SAT and VAT were taken from patients undergoing resection for oesophago-gastric cancer, and healthy controls (n = 16 and 8 respectively). RNA was isolated and reverse transcribed. cDNA was hybridised to the Affymetrix Clariom S microarray and data analysed using R/Bioconductor. Differential expression of genes was assessed using empirical Bayes and moderated-t-statistic approaches. Category enrichment analysis was used with a tissue-specific background to examine the biological context of differentially expressed genes. Selected differentially regulated genes were validated by qPCR. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for intelectin-1 was performed on all VAT samples. The previously-described cohort plus 12 additional patients from each group also had plasma I = intelectin-1 ELISA carried out.

resultsIn VAT vs. SAT comparisons, there were 2101, 1722, and 1659 significantly regulated genes in the cachectic, weight stable, and control groups, respectively. There were 2200 significantly regulated genes from VAT in cachectic patients compared with controls. Genes involving inflammation were enriched in cancer and control VAT vs. SAT, although different genes contributed to enrichment in each group. Energy metabolism, fat browning (e.g. uncoupling protein 1), and adipogenesis genes were down-regulated in cancer VAT (P = 0.043, P = 5.4 × 10

conclusionsSAT and VAT have unique gene expression signatures in cancer and cachexia. VAT is metabolically active in cancer, and intelectin-1 may be a target for therapeutic manipulation. VAT may play a fundamental role in cachexia, but the down-regulation of energy metabolism genes implies a limited role for fat browning in cachectic patients, in contrast to pre-clinical models.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueCachexiaCytokinesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansLectinsMaleNeoplasmsCytokinesGPI-Linked ProteinsITLN1 protein, humanLectinsAdiposeCancer cachexiaGenesIntelectinMicroarray

Identifiers

PMID32232960
PMCPMC7432578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.