Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232716›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase as biomarkers for urothelial cancer treated with immunotherapy.

G L Banna, R Di Quattro, L Malatino, G Fornarini, A Addeo, M Maruzzo, V Urzia, F Rundo, H Lipari, U De Giorgi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

G L BannaDivision of Medical Oncology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
R Di QuattroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
L MalatinoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
G FornariniMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
A AddeoOncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
M MaruzzoMedical Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
V UrziaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
F RundoSTMicroelectronics ADG Central R&D, Catania, Italy.
H LipariDivision of Medical Oncology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
U De GiorgiIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per io Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, FC, Italy. ugo.degiorgi@irst.emr.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7520-2908
U BassoMedical Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
University of Catania · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITSTMicroelectronics (Italy) · ITUnited Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) unlikely to benefit from immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS/PATIENTS: We explored the predictive and prognostic values of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), with cut-offs ≥ 3 and ≥ 5, and of a urothelial immune prognostic index (UIPI, based on increased NLR and LDH), on 146 patients.

resultsNLR and UIPI significantly predicted progressive disease and progression-free survival with both cut-offs (p = 0.0069, p = 0.0034, p = 0.0160, p = 0.0063; p < 0.001, p = 0.021, p = 0.014, p = 0.026; for NLR-3, NLR-5, UIPI-3, UIPI-5, respectively) and overall survival when NLR cut-off was ≥ 5 (p = 0.03 and p = 0.024, for NLR-5 and UIPI-5, respectively).

conclusionsNLR-5 deserves prospective validation to identify mUC patients with poor prognosis following ICIs.

Indexed as

LymphocytesNeutrophilsAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedUrologic NeoplasmsUrotheliumBiomarkersImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsL-Lactate DehydrogenaseBiomarkerImmunotherapyLDHNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioPrognosticUrothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID32232716
OpenAlexW3013010942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.