Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232709›Full record

ReviewPituitary2020

Long-course temozolomide in aggressive pituitary adenoma: real-life experience in two tertiary care centers and review of the literature.

Laura Lizzul, Giuseppe Lombardi, Mattia Barbot, Filippo Ceccato, Marina Paola Gardiman, Daniela Regazzo, Luisa Bellu, Elena Mazza, Marco Losa, Carla Scaroni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Aggressive corticotroph tumors and carcinomas.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2022
    Review
  12. Aggressive prolactinoma (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura LizzulEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Giuseppe LombardiNeurooncology Unit, Venetian Oncologic Institute (IOV), 35121, Padua, Italy.
Mattia BarbotEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Filippo CeccatoEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Marina Paola GardimanPathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Daniela RegazzoEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Luisa BelluNeurooncology Unit, Venetian Oncologic Institute (IOV), 35121, Padua, Italy.
Elena MazzaDepartment of Oncology and Pathology Unit, San Raffaele University Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Marco LosaPituitary Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Carla ScaroniEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, 35121, Padua, Italy. carla.scaroni@unipd.it.
University of Padua · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAggressive pituitary adenomas (APAs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs) are challenging for their invasive nature, resistance to treatment and recurrences. Temozolomide (TMZ) is used with benefit and well-tolerated toxicity profile in APAs and PCs. In most studies patients received ≤ 12 cycles but the best length of treatment is debated since other options after discontinuation are scarce and a second course is mainly unsuccessful.

methodsWe report outcomes of 8 patients with APAs and PCs treated with TMZ for more than 12 continuous cycles with a literature review. Data were retrospectively collected from Padua and Milan University Hospitals. TMZ was used as a single agent (150-200 p.o. mg/m2 daily, 5/28 days) for 14 to 45 cycles.

resultsEight patients (7 M), 7 APAs and 1 PC. Previous treatments included neurosurgery and radiotherapy in all cases except two giant masses (ACTH-silent APA and prolactinoma). No patient had progression disease (PD) during long-term treatment nor toxicities. No one had complete response (CR) but four had partial response (PR). Four ACTH+ tumors maintained stable disease (SD) but the secretion pattern improved in all. After drug withdrawal, three had delayed PD (2 after 18 and one after 29 months, all ACTH+); two are still in SD.

conclusionsTMZ may be useful and well-tolerated in APAs and PCs as a long-term therapy. PR appears within the first cycles with no escape throughout the treatment; most patients achieve SD. We suggest extended protocols particularly in responsive ACTH+  PAs and PCs, when further therapies may be unsuccessful.

Indexed as

Duration of TherapyACTH-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaAdenomaAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCarcinomaChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurosurgical ProceduresPituitary NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingTemozolomideAggressive pituitary adenomaPitNETsPituitary carcinomaPituitary tumorsTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID32232709
OpenAlexW3013546001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.