Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232699›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: emotional impact and guidelines for psychological support.

Serena Oliveri, Giulia Ongaro, Ilaria Durosini, Giuseppe Curigliano, Gabriella Pravettoni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a systematic review of epidemiological studies.Annals of breast surgery : an open access journal to bridge breast surgeons across the world · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Serena OliveriDepartment of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. serena.oliveri@unimi.it.
Giulia OngaroDepartment of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Ilaria DurosiniApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe CuriglianoDepartment of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Gabriella PravettoniDepartment of Oncology and Hematoncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

The Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences M13-0260:1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuring the last two decades, the number of breast implants used in aesthetic, oncologic, and risk-reducing surgery has increased substantially mainly due to the improvement and confirmed safety of these devices. Since the identification of the first case of anaplastic large cell lymphoma associated with a breast implant (BIA-ALCL) 20 years ago, there has been an increase in the number of reports of this very rare disease, demonstrating a clear association with breast implants. While the majority of cases are localized and cured by implant removal and full capsulectomy, a small percentage require chemotherapy and the mortality rate is very low. Nevertheless, the evidence linking BIA-ALCL to implant surface texturing has raised concerns about the long-term safety of these devices resulting in patient and regulatory authority concerns globally. METHODS AND

resultsIn this commentary, we report the current debate on BIA-ALCL and the main European government's actions, with a special focus on the emotional impact that media coverage has on cancer patients. We comment the emotional impact of such risk for patients with breast implant, the hard process of patient's acceptance for mastectomy and reconstructive surgery, and how this is an essential part of recovery and return to the normal living for many women.

conclusionWe conclude by providing guidelines for patient-physician communication and patients' psychological support on this topic of delicate actuality. Our contribution aims at guiding the medical community in managing risk communication about BIA-ALCL with a multidisciplinary approach, according to the most recently available published evidence.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsCounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphoma, Large-Cell, AnaplasticPostoperative ComplicationsPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisPsychotherapyBIA-ALCLBreast prosthesesDecision-makingPersonalized medicinePsychological supportQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID32232699
OpenAlexW3013969356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.