Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232691›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2020

A new risk stratification model for intravesical recurrence, disease progression, and cancer-specific death in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: the J-NICE risk tables.

Makito Miyake, Hideyasu Matsuyama, Satoshi Teramukai, Fumie Kinoshita, Isao Yokota, Hiroaki Matsumoto, Keiji Shimada, Mitsuru Kinjyo, Tatsuro Shimokama, Koji Okumura and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Hideyasu MatsuyamaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Satoshi TeramukaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Fumie KinoshitaDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Isao YokotaDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita15 Nishi7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Hiroaki MatsumotoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Keiji ShimadaDepartment of Pathology, Nara City Hospital, 1501 Higashi kidera-cho, Nara-shi, Nara, 630-8305, Japan.
Mitsuru KinjyoDepartment of Pathology, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, 1-1-1 Harunomachi, Yahatahigashi-ku, Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka, 805-0050, Japan.
Tatsuro ShimokamaDepartment of Pathology, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, 1-1-1 Harunomachi, Yahatahigashi-ku, Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka, 805-0050, Japan.
Koji OkumuraDepartment of Urology, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, 1-1-1 Harunomachi, Yahatahigashi-ku, Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka, 805-0050, Japan.
Masaya YomenoriDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
Hideki EnokidaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
Masayuki NakagawaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
Yasushi NakaiDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Kiyohide FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan. kiyokun@naramed-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-2464
Nishinihon Uro-oncology Extensive Collaboration group
Kagoshima University · JPNara Medical University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNippon Steel Yawata Memorial Hospital · JPYamaguchi University · JPHokkaido University · JPNara City Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to establish new risk tables for the current clinical setting, enabling short- and long-term risk stratification for recurrence, progression, and cancer-specific death after transurethral resection in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Currently available risk tables lack input from the 2004 World Health Organization grading system and risk prediction for cancer-specific death.

methodsThis was a multi-institutional database study of 1490 patients diagnosed with NMIBC (the development cohort). A multivariate Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard model was used to assess the prognostic impact of various factors. Patients were classified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups according to a sum of the weight of selected factors, and predicted cumulative rates were calculated. Internal validation was conducted using 200 bootstrap resamples to assess the optimism for the c-index and estimate a bias-corrected c-index. External validation of the developed risk table was performed on an independent dataset of 91 patients.

resultsThe Japanese NIshinihon uro-onCology Extensive collaboration group (J-NICE) risk stratification table was derived from six, five, and two factors for recurrence, progression, and cancer-specific death, respectively. The internal validation bias-corrected c-index values were 0.619, 0.621, and 0.705, respectively. The application of the J-NICE table to an external dataset resulted in c-indices for recurrence, progression, and cancer-specific death of 0.527, 0.691, and 0.603, respectively.

conclusionsWe propose a novel risk stratification model that predicts outcomes of treated NMIBC and may overcome the shortcomings of existing risk models. Further external validation is required to strengthen its clinical impact.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsYoung AdultPredictionPrognosisProgressionRecurrenceRiskUrinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32232691
OpenAlexW3013601310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.