ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2020
A retrospective review of outcomes in the treatment of hyperammonemia with renal replacement therapy due to inborn errors of metabolism.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracorporeal pediatric renal replacement therapy: diversifying application beyond kidney failure.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Continuous renal replacement therapy and therapeutic plasma exchange in pediatric liver failure.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Kidney Replacement Therapy and Mortality in Children With Inborn Errors of Metabolism: A Meta-analysis.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Multisite Retrospective Review of Outcomes in Renal Replacement Therapy for Neonates with Inborn Errors of Metabolism.The Journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Characteristics of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in the acute treatment of inherited metabolic disorders.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOutcomes for severe hyperammonemia treated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) reported in the literature vary widely. This has created differing recommendations regarding when RRT is beneficial for hyperammonemic patients.
methodsTo evaluate our institution's experience with RRT in pediatric patients with inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) and potential prognostic indicators of a better or worse outcome, we performed a retrospective chart review of patients who received RRT for hyperammonemia. Our cohort included 19 patients with confirmed IEMs who received RRT between 2000 and 2017. Descriptive statistics are presented as medians with interquartile ranges with appropriate statistical testing assuming unequal variance.
resultsThere were 16 males (84%) and 3 females (16%) identified for inclusion in this study. There were 9 survivors (47%) and 10 non-survivors (53%). The average age of survivors was 67 months (age range from 3 days to 15.6 years). The average age of non-survivors was 1.8 months (age range from 2 days to 18.7 months). Peak ammonia, ammonia on admission, and at RRT initiation were higher in non-survivors compared with survivors. Higher ammonia levels and no change in ammonia between admission and RRT initiation were associated with an increased risk of mortality.
conclusionsHyperammonemia affects two distinct patient populations; neonates with markedly elevated ammonia levels on presentation and older children who often have established IEM diagnoses and require RRT after failing nitrogen-scavenging therapy. Our experience demonstrates no significant change in mortality associated with neonatal hyperammonemia, which remains high despite improvements in RRT and intensive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.