Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232590›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020

Cellular Reprogramming Approaches to Engineer Cardiac Pacemakers.

Angel Xiao, Hee Cheol Cho

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angel XiaoEmory University School of Medicine, 201 Dowman Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Hee Cheol ChoDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University, HSRB E-184, 1760 Haygood Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. heecheol.cho@emory.edu.
Emory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe goal of this paper is to review present knowledge regarding biological pacemakers created by somatic reprogramming as a platform for mechanistic and metabolic understanding of the rare subpopulation of pacemaker cells, with the ultimate goal of creating biological alternatives to electronic pacing devices. RECENT

findingsSomatic reprogramming of cardiomyocytes by reexpression of embryonic transcription factor T-box 18 (TBX18) converts them into pacemaker-like. Recent studies take advantage of this model to gain insight into the electromechanical, metabolic, and architectural intricacies of the cardiac pacemaker cell across various models, including a surgical model of complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) in adult rats. The studies reviewed here reinforce the potential utility of TBX18-induced pacemaker myocytes (iPMS) as a minimally invasive treatment for heart block. Several challenges which must be overcome to develop a viable therapeutic intervention based on these observations are discussed.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingPacemaker, ArtificialAnimalsAtrioventricular BlockCardiac Pacing, ArtificialHumansMyocytes, CardiacRatsT-Box Domain ProteinsT-Box Domain ProteinsAtrioventricular blockBiological pacemakerBradycardiaGene therapyInduced pacemaker myocytes

Identifiers

PMID32232590
OpenAlexW3013380379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.