Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232450›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Estimated Costs Associated With Radiation Therapy for Positive Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy.

Alberto Martini, Kathryn E Marqueen, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Nikhil Waingankar, Ethan Wajswol, Fahad Khan, Nicola Fossati, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Ashutosh K Tewari and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. On the use of the "Translational andrology and urology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto MartiniDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Kathryn E MarqueenDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Ugo Giovanni FalagarioDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Nikhil WaingankarDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Ethan WajswolDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Fahad KhanDepartment of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Nicola FossatiDepartment of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiDepartment of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiDepartment of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Ashutosh K TewariDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Richard StockDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Ardeshir R RastinehadDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prostate cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm among men and is the one with the highest positive surgical margin (PSM) rate. This high rate is due to the difficulty in balancing the risk of extraprostatic disease and excising periprostatic structures, which ultimately affects patients' quality of life. In the case of a PSM, the appropriateness of adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) should be discussed. The financial burden of PSMs on health systems has not been investigated. Objective: To estimate the financial costs associated with a PSM during radical prostatectomy on the basis of the odds of undergoing aRT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data on men with prostate cancer from the US National Cancer Database (January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2015). Data were requested in March 2019, accessed in April 2019, and analyzed in August 2019. Exposure: Treatment with radical prostatectomy followed by aRT, if indicated. Main Outcomes and Measures: The attributable risk fraction of PSMs on undergoing aRT was estimated from a logistic regression with aRT administration as the outcome. The analysis was adjusted for patients' socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and tumor characteristics. The aRT cost for the year 2019 was calculated using the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System. The fraction of this cost attributable to a PSM was estimated according to its attributable risk fraction. Results: In total, 230 175 men were identified (median [interquartile range] age at diagnosis, 62.0 [56.0-67.0] years). Overall, 22.8% of the patients had a PSM. Patients with PSMs were more likely than those without PSMs to be older (median [interquartile range] age, 62.0 [56.0-66.0] years vs 62.0 [57.0-67.0] years) and nonwhite (9320 patients [17.8%] vs 29 872 patients [16.8%]), to have higher comorbidity scores (1604 patients [3.1%] vs 4884 patients [2.7%] with a Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score ≥2) and worse tumor characteristics (category T3 and T4 disease, 26 394 patients [50.3%] vs 36 040 patients [20.3%]), and to have lower socioeconomic indicators (median annual income <$30 000, 5708 patients [10.9%] vs 17 874 patients [10.1%]; proportion of individuals without a high school degree in the area ≥29%, 6925 patients [13.2%] vs 22 648 patients [12.7%]). In addition, PSMs were documented more frequently at nonacademic institutions than academic ones (31 702 patients [60.5%] vs 20 714 patients [39.5%]). A total of 11 585 patients (5.0%) underwent aRT, and 7698 of them (3.3%) had a PSM at the final pathology examination. When controlling for patients' socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and tumor characteristics, men with PSMs were more likely than those with negative margins to undergo aRT, with an odds ratio of 3.79 (95% CI, 3.63-3.96; P < .001). The attributable risk fraction of the presence of a PSM on aRT was 44% (95% CI, 42%-45%). The attributable cost of a PSM was calculated as $17 356 (95% CI, $16 567-$17 751). Assuming 60 000 prostatectomies in 2019 and similar trends of PSM and aRT, the overall health burden attributable to PSMs was calculated to be $52 068 000 (95% CI, $49 701 000-$53 253 000). Conclusions and Relevance: The estimated aRT cost attributable to the presence of a PSM was $17 356, resulting in $52 068 000 in spending on aRT in 2019. Strategies to reduce PSMs could be associated with a reduction in the overall health costs of surgically treated PCa.

Indexed as

RadiotherapyAgedCohort StudiesHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedProstateProstatic NeoplasmsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32232450
PMCPMC7109597
OpenAlexW3013257724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.