Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232368›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020

Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence.

Thomas Hörberg, Maria Larsson, Ingrid Ekström, Camilla Sandöy, Peter Lundén, Jonas K Olofsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Olfactory Categorization Is Shaped by a Transmodal Cortical Network for Evaluating Perceptual Predictions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Application research and development of objective examination of olfactory function].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Odor-driven face-like categorization in the human infant brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Olfactory-colour crossmodal correspondences in art, science, and design.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas HörbergGösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Maria LarssonGösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Ingrid EkströmDepartment of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Camilla SandöyGösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Peter LundénGösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.
Jonas K OlofssonGösta Ekman Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual stimuli often dominate nonvisual stimuli during multisensory perception. Evidence suggests higher cognitive processes prioritize visual over nonvisual stimuli during divided attention. Visual stimuli should thus be disproportionally distracting when processing incongruent cross-sensory stimulus pairs. We tested this assumption by comparing visual processing with olfaction, a "primitive" sensory channel that detects potentially hazardous chemicals by alerting attention. Behavioral and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were assessed in a bimodal object categorization task with congruent or incongruent odor-picture pairings and a delayed auditory target that indicated whether olfactory or visual cues should be categorized. For congruent pairings, accuracy was higher for visual compared to olfactory decisions. However, for incongruent pairings, reaction times (RTs) were faster for olfactory decisions. Behavioral results suggested that incongruent odors interfered more with visual decisions, thereby providing evidence for an "olfactory dominance" effect. Categorization of incongruent pairings engendered a late "slow wave" ERP effect. Importantly, this effect had a later amplitude peak and longer latency during visual decisions, likely reflecting additional categorization effort for visual stimuli in the presence of incongruent odors. In sum, contrary to what might be inferred from theories of "visual dominance," incongruent odors may in fact uniquely attract mental processing resources during perceptual incongruence.

Indexed as

AdultEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionPattern Recognition, PhysiologicalPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationPhysical StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adultevent-related brain potentialsobject categorizationolfactionolfactory–visual processingvisual dominance

Identifiers

PMID32232368
PMCPMC7264693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.