Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232180›Full record

ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2020

Antibiotic prescribing in neonatal sepsis: an Australian nationwide survey.

Brendan McMullan, Celia Cooper, Naomi Spotswood, Rodney James, Cheryl Jones, Pamela Konecny, Christopher Blyth, Thursky Karen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neonatal Staphylococcus Aureus Sepsis: a 20-year Western Australian experience.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Neonatal ICU antibiotic use trends within an integrated delivery network.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Brendan McMullanImmunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5144-3416
Celia CooperDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Naomi SpotswoodBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rodney JamesNational Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cheryl JonesFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pamela KonecnyInfectious Diseases, Immunology and Sexual Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Christopher BlythSchool of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Thursky KarenNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUBurnet Institute · AUSutherland Hospital · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AUWomen's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate quality and variation in antibiotic prescribing for neonatal sepsis.

designWe analysed prescribing in hospitalised neonates using the National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey in Australian neonates from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2018.

settingData from antibiotic point prevalence surveys performed in hospitals, ranging from rural hospitals to tertiary paediatric and maternity hospitals within Australia. PATIENTS: Admitted neonates <28 days of age from participating hospitals.

main outcome measuresVariation and appropriateness in prescribing for neonatal sepsis and variation in dosing for gentamicin and benzylpenicillin across hospitals.

resultsA total of 415 prescriptions among 214 neonates from 39 different hospitals were included. The majority of prescriptions (342, 82.4%) were for neonates <7 days of age. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were gentamicin and benzylpenicillin, with 323 (77.8%) prescriptions. Dosing variability was substantial, with doses ranging from 2 to 8 mg/kg for gentamicin (median 5 mg/kg, IQR 4-5) and from 45 to 72 mg/kg for benzylpenicillin (median 60 mg/kg, IQR 50-60), although only 13 (3.2%) and 19 (4.6%) prescriptions were locally assessed as inappropriate or non-compliant with guidelines, respectively. At time of audit, 22% of antibiotics had been given for more than 48 hours and 9% more than 72 hours, although microbiologically confirmed infection was documented in only nine (4.2%) neonates.

conclusionsPrescribing for neonatal sepsis was dominated by use of benzylpenicillin and gentamicin with substantial variation in dosing. A small minority had culture-confirmed infection. Efforts to standardise antibiotic dosing and duration for suspected neonatal sepsis are recommended.

Indexed as

epidemiologyinfectious diseasesneonatologytherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID32232180
PMCPMC7101048
OpenAlexW3010643986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.