Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232107›Full record

ArticleBioelectronic medicine2019

Prospective trial examining safety and efficacy of microcurrent stimulation for the treatment of sinus pain and congestion.

Alan B Goldsobel, Niveditha Prabhakar, Blake T Gurfein

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectronic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03888274 (ClearUP Longitudinal Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03888274 nacompletednot on this map

ClearUP Longitudinal Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTivic Health SystemsRan2018 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsSinus Pain, CongestionArmsClearUP Sinus Pain Relief
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The interplay between pulse width and activation depth in TENS: a computational study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Bioelectric Effect of a Microcurrent Toothbrush on Plaque Removal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alan B GoldsobelAllergy and Asthma Associates of Santa Clara Valley Research Center, San Jose, CA USA.
Niveditha Prabhakar2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
Blake T Gurfein3University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2594-6308
University of California, San Francisco · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammation and swelling of the sinus and nasal mucosa are commonly caused by viral infection, bacterial infection, or exposure to allergens and irritants. Sinonasal inflammation can cause symptoms of nasal congestion, facial pressure, and rhinogenic facial pain or "sinus pain". A previous randomized controlled study demonstrated that acute treatment with non-invasive periorbital microcurrent stimulation resulted in a rapid and clinically meaningful reduction in self-report of sinus pain that significantly outperformed sham control treatment. Here, we assessed the acute durability of microcurrent pain relief and longitudinal effects of 4 weeks of daily microcurrent treatment in patients presenting with sinus pain.

methodsThirty subjects with moderate facial pain (numeric rating scale ≥5) attributed to self-reported sinonasal disease were enrolled in a single-arm, prospective interventional study. At enrollment, subjects were given a microcurrent treatment device and written instructions and self-administered the device to the bilateral periorbital regions for 5 mins. Subjects were instructed to treat themselves at home once daily and up to four times daily as needed for 4 weeks. Pain was measured both acutely and weekly during the 4 weeks of treatment using the numeric rating scale. Congestion and medication use data were collected weekly using the Congestion Quantifier 7 (CQ7) and medication diary, respectively.

resultsThirty patients were enrolled and completed the study. Microcurrent therapy rapidly reduced post-treatment numeric rating scale for pain by - 1.2 at 10 mins (

conclusionSelf-administered periorbital microcurrent treatment given at home was efficacious in significantly reducing moderate sinus pain for up to 6 hrs and significantly reducing moderate pain and congestion over 4 weeks of daily use. Microcurrent therapy was found to be safe with only minor side effects that resolved without intervention.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03888274. Registered 25 March 2019. Retroactively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03888274.

Indexed as

Allergic rhinitisCongestionCranial nerveFacial painMicrocurrentNasal congestionRhinologic facial painSinus painTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulationTrigeminal nerve

Identifiers

PMID32232107
PMCPMC7098235
OpenAlexW2991621410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.