Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32232105›Full record

ReviewBioelectronic medicine2019

Homeostatic activity regulation as a mechanism underlying the effect of brain stimulation.

Zhi Chai, Cungen Ma, Xiaoming Jin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Robust Target Selection in Response to Microstimulation of the Oculomotor System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Neuroprotective actions of norepinephrine in neurological diseases.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. SUMOylation and Major Depressive Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhi Chai1Neurobiology Research Center, College of Basic Medicine, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, 030619 China.
Cungen Ma1Neurobiology Research Center, College of Basic Medicine, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, 030619 China.
Xiaoming Jin2Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Department of Neurological Surgery, Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, 320 West 15th Street, NB 500C, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-8640
Shanxi University · CNNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

Homeostatic plasticity in the control of neuropathic painR01DA039530 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI JIN, XIAOMING · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperexcitability of the neural network often occurs after brain injuries or degeneration and is a key pathophysiological feature in certain neurological diseases such as epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and tinnitus. Although the standard approach of pharmacological treatments is to directly suppress the hyperexcitability through reducing excitation or enhancing inhibition, different techniques for stimulating brain activity are often used to treat refractory neurological conditions. However, it is unclear why stimulating brain activity would be effective for controlling hyperexcitability. Recent studies suggest that the pathogenesis in these disorders exhibits a transition from an initial activity loss after acute injury or progressive neurodegeneration to subsequent development of hyperexcitability. This process mimics homeostatic activity regulation and may contribute to developing network hyperexcitability that underlies neurological symptoms. This hypothesis also predicts that stimulating brain activity should be effective in reducing hyperexcitability due to homeostatic activity regulation and in relieving symptoms. Here we review current evidence of homeostatic plasticity in the development of hyperexcitability in some neurological diseases and the effects of brain stimulation. The homeostatic plasticity hypothesis may provide new insights into the pathophysiology of neurological diseases and may guide the use of brain stimulation techniques for treating them.

Indexed as

Brain stimulationEpilepsyHomeostatic synaptic plasticityHyperexcitabilityNeuropathic painStrokeTinnitusTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32232105
PMCPMC7098242
OpenAlexW2977140179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.