ReviewBioelectronic medicine2019
3D-bioprinted tracheal reconstruction: an overview.
Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- "We were already there where the narrow path …" Benign tracheal stenosis treatment: narrative review on the state of the art and future direction.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Characteristics of 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone Tracheal Scaffolds Implanted In Vivo.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Organic and Synthetic Substitutes in Tracheal Reconstruction: A Scoping Review (2015-2025).Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Contemporary Review of Trachea, Nose, and Ear Cartilage Bioengineering and Additive Manufacturing.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Tracheal Tissue Engineering: Principles and State of the Art.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Surgical Innovations in Tracheal Reconstruction: A Review on Synthetic Material Fabrication.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Epidemiology and Long-Term Outcomes in Thoracic Transplantation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- 3D Bioprinting in Otolaryngology: A Review.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Review
- (Bio)printing in Personalized Medicine-Opportunities and Potential Benefits.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Recent Developments in 3D Bio-Printing and Its Biomedical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Bioengineering lungs: An overview of current methods, requirements, and challenges for constructing scaffolds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- The promising rise of bioprinting in revolutionalizing medical science: Advances and possibilities.Regenerative therapy · 2021Review
- Bioprinting Technology in Skin, Heart, Pancreas and Cartilage Tissues: Progress and Challenges in Clinical Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Evaluation Strategies for Tissue-engineered Tracheas: FromIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital tracheomalacia and tracheal stenosis are commonly seen in premature infants. In adulthood, are typically related with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and can occur secondarily from tracheostomy, prolong intubation, trauma, infection and tumors. Both conditions are life-threatening when not managed properly. There are still some surgical limitations for certain pathologies, however tissue engineering is a promising approach to treat massive airway dysfunctions. 3D-bioprinting have contributed to current preclinical and clinical efforts in airway reconstruction. Several strategies have been used to overcome the difficulty of airway reconstruction such as scaffold materials, construct designs, cellular types, biologic components, hydrogels and animal models used in tracheal reconstruction. Nevertheless, additional long-term in vivo studies need to be performed to assess the efficacy and safety of tissue-engineered tracheal grafts in terms of mechanical properties, behavior and, the possibility of further stenosis development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.