ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2020
Interview-Informed Synthesized Contingency Analysis (IISCA): Novel Interpretations and Future Directions.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Compassion in the Assessment and Treatment of Severe Problem Behavior.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- How to Conduct More Culturally Responsive and Trauma-Informed Functional Assessment Interviews: A Tutorial.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Adapting a Functional Assessment of Cigarette Smoking for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- The Challenges Ahead: Concepts, Analytics, and Ethics of Value-Based Care in Applied Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Review
- Are Function-Based Interventions for Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders Trauma Informed? A Systematic Review.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Article
- Toward Maximizing Assessment Efficiency: A Synthesized Trial-Based Functional Analysis and Competing Stimulus Assessment.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Functional analysis: what have we learned in 85 years?Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2023Review
- Validating a Computerized Program for Supporting Visual Analysis During Functional Analysis: The Problem Behavior Multilevel Interpreter (PB.MI).Behavior analysis in practice · 2022Article
- Minimizing Escalation by Treating Dangerous Problem Behavior Within an Enhanced Choice Model.Behavior analysis in practice · 2022Article
- A Predictive Multimodal Framework to Alert Caregivers of Problem Behaviors for Children with ASD (PreMAC).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A component analysis of evocative and reinforcing variables influencing challenging behavior.Journal of applied behavior analysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The functional analysis (FA) methodology was developed to provide an empirical basis for understanding the reinforcers contributing to the maintenance of problem behavior. Previous research has demonstrated that multiple formats have been established to address some areas, such as practicality, efficiency, and safety. We reviewed the research on a new replication and extension of the standard FA format, the interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis (IISCA) and its subsequent treatment. We discuss the efficiency and effectiveness of the IISCA across various populations, settings, topographies of problem behaviors, and maintaining functions across 17 studies. Common treatment trends, novel developments, and other critical intervention components are also reviewed. We provide suggestions for future directions and guidelines for practitioners when considering the use of the IISCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.