ArticleCureus2020
Accuracy of Multi-echo Dixon Sequence in Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two-point Dixon and six-point Dixon magnetic resonance techniques in the detection, quantification and grading of hepatic steatosis.World journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Advances in application of novel magnetic resonance imaging technologies in liver disease diagnosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Evaluation of a Whole-Liver Dixon-Based MRI Approach for Quantification of Liver Fat in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Two Isocaloric Different Diets.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Quantification of bone marrow edema in rheumatoid arthritis by using high-speed T2-corrected multiecho acquisition ofClinical rheumatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective Today, a biopsy is the gold standard in the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver. However, a biopsy is an invasive technique, limited to the sample taken, and it may lead to misdiagnosis. Therefore, novel noninvasive options are needed. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) Dixon sequence and elastography using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) as a reference in the quantification of hepatic steatosis. Methods A total of 60 patients were included in the study. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRS, and elastography in order to quantify hepatosteatosis. MRI and MRS imaging studies were performed using MR Dixon and high-speed T2-corrected multiple-echo 1H-MRS sequence (HISTO) sequences, respectively, in order to calculate proton density fat fraction (PDFF) values. Results The mean MRI-PDFF value with the MRS region of interest (ROI) was found as 9.4% ± 12.1%. The mean MRS-PDFF was found as 8.9% ± 11.3%. No statistically significant difference was found between MRS-PDFF and MRI-PDFF values measured in ROI (p < 0.005). The correlation between MRS-PDFF and MRI-PDFF was examined with Spearman's correlation analysis. Accordingly, there was an excellent correlation between MRS and MRI values measured in ROI (r ≥ 0.8, p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated as 96%, 100%, 89.5%, and 92.6%, respectively, for MRI-PDFF in predicting hepatic steatosis for the same ROI localization with MRS. The optimum cut-off value of MRS-PDFF in predicting hepatic steatosis was found as 5.3% using the same ROI localization with MRS. Conclusion The results of this study indicated an excellent correlation between MRI-PDFF and MRS-PDFF. The multi-echo Dixon MRI technique seems a promising alternative method in the detection of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.