ReviewSAGE open medicine2020
A targeted systematic review of cost analyses for implementation of simulation-based education in healthcare.
Review in SAGE open medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Research Priorities in Digital Education for Health Care: Umbrella Review and Modified Delphi Method Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Learning by making - student-made models and creative projects for medical education: systematic review with qualitative synthesis.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Dyad learning versus individual learning under medical simulation conditions: a systematic review.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2022Pooled it
- Remote Augmented Reality Versus Traditional Simulation for Team Leader Assessment in a Cardiac Arrest Scenario: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Trial
- An Advanced Cardiac Life Support Application Improves Performance during Simulated Cardiac Arrest.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Trial
- Comparison of Error Rates in Technical Skills and Contextual Skills in a Large-Scale Peer-Assessed Clinical Skills Examination.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Screen-based simulation assessment for emergency medicine learners: a rapid review.BMC medical education · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Digital Training for Community Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Simulation, artificial intelligence, and competency-based frameworks in veterinary medical education: a narrative review.Journal of veterinary science · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Gamification with a Narrative Adapted to the Player's Profile in Obstetric Nursing Competencies: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial Protocol.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Article
- Facilitators and Barriers to Adoption of Mobile Learning Technologies in Undergraduate Health Professional Education in Clinical Environments: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Article
- Training for Pediatric Sepsis-A Medical Education Perspective and Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Choosing Wisely for Simulation-Based Learning in Health Professions Education.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Return on investment of rapid ICU workforce upskilling: an economic and cost-effectiveness analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- The surprising costs of on-site surgical team CRM training: a Dutch example analyzed.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Changing minds, saving lives: how training psychological safety transforms healthcare.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Death of the paediatric manikin: a scoping review.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in the use of simulation-based education for training healthcare providers in technical and non-technical skills. Simulation education and research programs have mostly focused on the impact on clinical knowledge and improvement of technical skills rather than on cost. To study and characterize existing evidence to inform multi-stakeholder investment decisions, we performed a systematic review of the literature on costs in simulation-based education in medicine in general and in neonatal resuscitation as a particular focus. We conducted a systematic literature search of the PubMed database using two targeted queries. The first searched for cost analyses of healthcare simulation-based education more broadly, and the second was more narrowly focused on cost analyses of neonatal resuscitation training. The more general query identified 47 qualified articles. The most common specialties for education interventions were surgery (51%); obstetrics, gynecology, or pediatrics (11%); medicine, nursing, or medical school (11%); and urology (9%), accounting for over 80% of articles. The neonatal resuscitation query identified five qualified articles. The two queries identified seven large-scale training implementation studies, one in the United States and six in low-income countries. There were two articles each from Tanzania and India and one article each from Zambia and Ghana. Methods, definitions, and reported estimates varied across articles, implying interpretation, comparison, and generalization of program effects are challenging. More work is needed to understand the costs, processes, and outcomes likely to make simulation-based education programs cost-effective and scalable. To optimize return on investments in training, assessing resource requirements, associated costs, and subsequent outcomes can inform stakeholders about the potential sustainability of SBE programs. Healthcare stakeholders and decision makers will benefit from more transparent, consistent, rigorous, and explicit assessments of simulation-based education program development and implementation costs in low- and high-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.