ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
Actionable Exomic Secondary Findings in 280 Lebanese Participants.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secondary findings in hereditary cancer genes after germline genetic testing - systematic review of literature.Human genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Implementation of a medical genomics program for rare diseases in Uruguay.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- ACMG-Recommended Actionable Secondary Findings from 1600 Clinical Exomes in the South Marmara Region in Turkiye.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Frequency and Spectrum of Actionable Secondary Findings in the Maltese Population.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Medically Actionable Secondary Findings from Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) Data in a Sample of 3972 Individuals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A genotype-first approach identifies high incidence of NF1 pathogenic variants with distinct disease associations.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Certain vs. uncertain actionable secondary findings in a cohort of 500 Lebanese participants: What to report to the patient?PloS one · 2025Article
- Apolipoprotein E genotypes are associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Lebanese adults with type 2 diabetes: a case-control study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Analysis of 14,392 whole genomes reveals 3.5% of Qataris carry medically actionable variants.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Re-evaluation of a Fibrillin-1 Gene Variant of Uncertain Significance Using the ClinGen Guidelines.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2024Article
- Clinically actionable secondary findings in 130 triads from sub-Saharan African families with non-syndromic orofacial clefts.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2023Article
- Secondary findings in a large Pakistani cohort tested with whole genome sequencing.Life science alliance · 2023Article
- Landscape of Secondary Findings in Chinese Population: A Practice of ACMG SF v3.0 List.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical exome-based panel testing for medically actionable secondary findings in a cohort of 383 Italian participants.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Secondary findings in 622 Turkish clinical exome sequencing data.Journal of human genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expanded use of NGS tests in genetic diagnosis enables the massive generation of data related to each individual, among which some findings are of medical value. Over the last three and a half years, 280 unrelated Lebanese patients, presenting a wide spectrum of genetic disorders were referred to our center for genetic evaluation by WES. Molecular diagnosis was established in 56% of the cases, as was previously reported. The current study evaluates secondary findings in these patients in 59 genes, linked to conditions mostly responsive to medical interventions, as per the ACMG guidelines. Our analysis allowed us to detect 19 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 24 individuals from our cohort. Dominant actionable variants were found in 17 individuals representing 6% of the studied population. Genes associated with dominant cardiac diseases were the most frequently mutated: variants were found in 2.1% of our cohort. Genetic predisposition to cancer syndromes was observed in 1.07% of the cases. In parallel to dominant disease alleles, our analysis identified a recessive pathogenic disease allele in 2.5% of the individuals included in this study. Of interest, some variants were detected in different patients from our cohort thus urging the study of their prevalence in our population and the implementation, when needed, of specific genetic testing in the neonatal screening panel. In conclusion, here we report the first study estimating the actionable pathogenic variant load in the Lebanese population. Communicating current findings to the patients will enable them to benefit from a multi-disciplinary approach. Furthermore, tailoring the ACMG guidelines to the population is suggested, especially in highly consanguineous populations where the information related to recessive alleles might be highly beneficial to patients and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.