Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32231494›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Male Breast Cancer Patients' Perspectives on Their Health Care Situation: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Sarah Maria Halbach, Evamarie Midding, Nicole Ernstmann, Rachel Würstlein, Rainer Weber, Sherin Christmann, Christoph Kowalski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diseases of the Male Breast: Gynecomastia and Breast Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Male Breast Cancer Patients: Lack of Evidence.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Maria HalbachCenter for Health Communication and Health Service Research (CHSR), Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Evamarie MiddingCenter for Health Communication and Health Service Research (CHSR), Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nicole ErnstmannCenter for Health Communication and Health Service Research (CHSR), Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rachel WürstleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCCLMU, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Rainer WeberDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sherin ChristmannCenter for Health Communication and Health Service Research (CHSR), Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph KowalskiGerman Cancer Society (DKG), Berlin, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DEGerman Cancer Society · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMale breast cancer is rare. No information was available on how male breast cancer patients (MBCPs) experience the health care they receive in Germany in a setting that is tailored to women. The aim of this study was to explore the health care situation of MBCPs from their perspectives.

methodsThe study follows a mixed-methods design, combining quantitative data from a standardized written questionnaire with qualitative data from personal interviews. Descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and qualitative content analysis (qualitative data) were used for data analysis.

resultsQuestionnaires completed by 100 and personal interviews of 27 MBCPs were analyzed. Several men reported mainly positive experiences while others experienced shortcomings. These included delays in diagnosis, health care provider uncertainty about treatment (tamoxifen, radiation therapy), experiences of stigmatization, and issues of continuity of care including unclear responsibilities for aftercare and access challenges to breast-cancer-specific care in gynecology settings.

conclusionsThe awareness of male breast cancer needs to be increased among the public, health care providers and researchers in order to avoid delays in diagnosis and reduce stigmatization and uncertainty about treatment. Health care structures ensuring access to gynecology care and clear responsibilities for aftercare need to be established.

Indexed as

Health services researchMale breast cancerMixed methodsPatient care

Identifiers

PMID32231494
PMCPMC7098323
OpenAlexW2969275484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.