ArticleTurk pediatri arsivi2020
Rituximab experience in children with nephrotic syndrome: what have we observed differently.
Article in Turk pediatri arsivi, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Rituximab as Adjunctive Therapy to Immunosuppressive Agents in Adult Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Clinical practice guidelines for rituximab treatment in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025Review
- Article
- Long Term Evaluations of First Single-dose Rituximab in Children with Steroid-Dependent Minimal-Change Nephrotic Syndrome.Renal failure · 2024Observational
- The outcome of rituximab in treating steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome.: Histopathology and immunosuppressive drugs as predicting factors.Saudi medical journal · 2022Article
- Rituximab treatment for difficult-to-treat nephrotic syndrome in children: a multicenter, retrospective studyTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimWe aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab therapy in children with nephrotic syndromes and to share our experiences. MATERIAL AND
methodsTwelve children with nephrotic syndrome (four with steroid-dependent, eight with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome) who were treated with rituximab were retrospectively evaluated in terms of clinical and laboratory data and CD19-20 levels. All patients received rituximab (375 mg/m
resultsThe overall remission rates in patients with steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome were 100% and 27%. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis was diagnosed in six patients and the remission rate was 33% in this population. CD19 cell depletion was observed in 10 of the 12 children. Seven of the 10 patients with CD19 depletion achieved remission, whereas the other three had persistent nephrotic proteinuria despite CD19 depletion. Two patients without CD19 depletion never achieved remission. Relapse occurred in three of the seven patients associated with increased CD19.
conclusionWe observed that rituximab could be given without waiting for a proteinuria-free period under steroid therapy. Our result suggest that administering four weekly doses of rituximab increases the likelihood of remission, considering the amount of drug lost in the urine of children with nephrotic proteinuria. However, our findings must be confirmed with dose-comparison studies conducted with larger populations and an evaluation of long-term adverse effects. Some patients did not achieve remission despite B cell depletion, which suggests that B cell depletion is necessary but insufficient for remission in nephrotic syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.