ArticleApplied physics letters2020
Changes in microbubble dynamics upon adhesion to a solid surface.
Article in Applied physics letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tuning the Shell Elasticity of Phospholipid-Coated Microbubbles via Palmitic Acid Doping.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Article
- Functionalized monodisperse microbubble production: microfluidic method for fast, controlled, and automated removal of excess coating material.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- Photoacoustic Impulse Response of Lipid-Coated Ultrasound Contrast Agents.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The interaction between an acoustically driven microbubble and a surface is of interest for a variety of applications, such as ultrasound imaging and therapy. Prior investigations have mainly focused on acoustic effects of a rigid boundary, where it was generally observed that the wall increases inertia and reduces the microbubble resonance frequency. Here we investigate the response of a lipid-coated microbubble adherent to a rigid wall. Firm adhesion between the microbubble and a glass surface was achieved through either specific (biotin/avidin) or nonspecific (lipid/glass) interactions. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy was used to verify conditions leading to either adhesion or non-adhesion of the bubble to a glass or rigid polymer surface. Individual microbubbles were driven acoustically to sub-nanometer-scale radial oscillations using a photoacoustic technique. Remarkably, adherent microbubbles were shown to have a higher resonance frequency than non-adherent microbubbles resting against the wall. Analysis of the resonance curves indicates that adhesion stiffens the bubble by an apparent increase in the shell elasticity term and decrease in the shell viscosity. Based on these results, we conclude that surface adhesion is dominant over acoustic effects for low-amplitude microbubble oscillations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.