ArticlePloS one2020
Signal changes in T2-weighted MRI of liver metastases under bevacizumab-A practical imaging biomarker?
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase-adaptive automated whole-liver quantification of signal intensity-derived liver indices from gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Synchronous neuroendocine liver metastases in comparison to primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on MRI and SSR-PET/CT.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Treatment Assessment of pNET and NELM after Everolimus by Quantitative MRI Parameters.Biomedicines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate signal changes in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of liver metastases under treatment with and without bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy and to compare these signal changes to tumor contrast enhancement. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective analysis of 44 patients, aged 36-84 years, who underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging including T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhancement sequences. Patients received bevacizumab-containing (n = 22) or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy (n = 22). Magnetic resonance imaging was obtained at baseline and at three follow-ups (on average 3, 6 and 9 months after initial treatment). Three independent readers rated the T2 signal intensity and the relative contrast enhancement of the metastases on a 5-point scale.
resultsT2 signal intensity of metastases treated with bevacizumab showed a significant (p<0.001) decrease in T2 signal intensity after initial treatment and exhibit compared to conventionally treated metastases significantly (p<0.001 for each follow-up) hypointense (bevacizumab: 0.70 ± 0.83 before vs. -1.55 ± 0.61, -1.91 ± 0.62, and -1.97 ± 0.52; cytotoxic: 0.73 ± 0.79 before vs. -0.69 ± 0.81, -0.71 ± 0.68, and -0.75 ± 0.65 after 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively). T2 signal intensity was strongly correlated with tumor contrast enhancement (r = 0.71; p<0.001). Intra-observer agreement for T2-signal intensity was substantial (κ = 0.75). The agreement for tumoral contrast enhancement between the readers was considerably lower (κ = 0.39).
conclusionLiver metastases exhibit considerably hypointense in T2-weighted imaging after treatment with bevacizumab, in contrast to conventionally treated liver metastases. Therefore, T2-weighted imaging seems to reflect the effect of bevacizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.