Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32231365›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2020

Burden of eye disease and demand for care in the Bangladesh Rohingya displaced population and host community: A cohort study.

Munir Ahmed, Noelle Whitestone, Jennifer L Patnaik, Mohammad Awlad Hossain, Lutful Husain, Mohammed Alauddin, Mushfiqur Rahaman, David Hunter Cherwek, Nathan Congdon, Danny Haddad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Munir AhmedOrbis Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Noelle WhitestoneIndependent consultant, Orbis International, New York, New York, United States of America.
Jennifer L PatnaikOrbis International, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0375-0187
Mohammad Awlad HossainOrbis Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Lutful HusainOrbis Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammed AlauddinOrbis Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mushfiqur RahamanCox's Bazar Baitush Sharaf Hospital, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1376-3886
David Hunter CherwekOrbis International, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0662-3340
Nathan CongdonOrbis International, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9866-3416
Danny HaddadOrbis International, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6299-1984
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing awareness that addressing chronic as well as acute health conditions may contribute importantly to the well-being of displaced populations, but eye care service has generally not been prioritized in crisis situations. We describe a replicable model of eye care provision as delivered by Orbis International and local partners to the Rohingya and host population in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, and characterize the burden of vision impairment and demand for sight-restoring services in this setting. METHODS AND

findingsOrbis International and local secondary facility Cox's Bazar Baitush Sharaf Hospital (CBBSH) provide eye care support to the Rohingya population and the host community of all ages in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, with fixed vision screening locations established in Camps 4 and 11 of the Kutupalong refugee settlement. Structured outreach targets these camps and four surrounding local subdistricts, with referrals made as needed for refraction (glasses measurement) and cataract surgery to CBBSH. Between February 2018 and March 2019, 48,105 displaced Rohingya (70.3%, among whom 71.6% were children and 46.5% women) and 20,357 local residents (29.7%, 88.5% children, 54.4% women) underwent vision screening. Displaced Rohingya sought services from a total of 12 surrounding camps, within which coverage was 17.3%, including 43.3% (27,027/62,424) of children aged 5-11 years and 60.0% (5,315/8,857) of adults ≥ 60 years old. The prevalence of blindness (presenting acuity < 3/60) among Rohingya patients exceeded that among local residents by 3- to 6-fold in each 10-year age group between 18 and 59 years (P < 0.001 comparing vision between the two groups in this age range), and the prevalence of cataract requiring surgery was also higher in Rohingya patients (18-29 years: 4.67% versus 1.80%, P = 0.0019; 30-39: 7.61% versus 2.39%, P < 0.001; and 40-49 years: 7.91% versus 3.77%, P = 0.0014). A limitation of the study is lack of data on population prevalence of eye disease.

conclusionsThe burden of untreated eye disease is very high among the Rohingya, particularly those in their peak working years who could contribute most to the resiliency of their community. Demand for eye care service is also great among children and adults in this population with many competing healthcare priorities. Research is needed, building on strong evidence of benefit in settled populations, to explore the specific impact of vision care on the well-being of displaced populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBangladeshChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEye DiseasesFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32231365
PMCPMC7108691
OpenAlexW3013855538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.