Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32231354›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Decreasing fluconazole susceptibility of clinical South African Cryptococcus neoformans isolates over a decade.

Serisha D Naicker, Ruth S Mpembe, Tsidiso G Maphanga, Thokozile G Zulu, Daniel Desanto, Jeannette Wadula, Nomonde Mvelase, Caroline Maluleka, Kessendri Reddy, Halima Dawood and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. A review of the current anti-New microbes and new infections · 2026
    Review
  6. Assessing the Anti-Cryptococcus Antifungal Potential of Artemisinin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Exposure ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lack of Association between Fluconazole Susceptibility andJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Antifungal drug resistance: an update.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serisha D NaickerNational Institute for Communicable Diseases (Centre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses), a Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4445-1482
Ruth S MpembeNational Institute for Communicable Diseases (Centre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses), a Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Tsidiso G MaphangaNational Institute for Communicable Diseases (Centre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses), a Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Thokozile G ZuluNational Institute for Communicable Diseases (Centre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses), a Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Daniel DesantoNational Institute for Communicable Diseases (Centre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses), a Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jeannette WadulaNational Health Laboratory Service, Microbiology Laboratory, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nomonde MvelaseNational Health Laboratory Service, Department of Medical Microbiology, RK Khan Hospital, Durban, South Africa.
Caroline MalulekaNational Health Laboratory Service, Microbiology Laboratory, Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
Kessendri ReddyNational Health Laboratory Service, Microbiology Laboratory, Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6701-9764
Halima DawoodNational Health Laboratory Service, Microbiology Laboratory, Edendale Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Motlatji MalobaNational Health Laboratory Service, Department of Medical Microbiology, Universitas Academic Laboratory Complex, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Nelesh P GovenderNational Institute for Communicable Diseases (Centre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses), a Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
for GERMS-SA
National Health Laboratory Service · ZA

Funding

Phased Implementation of a Public Health Programme: Cryptococcal Screening and Treatment in South AfricaR01AI118511 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BOULWARE, DAVID R, GOVENDER, NELESH PREMAPRAGASAN · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluconazole is used in combination with amphotericin B for induction treatment of cryptococcal meningitis and as monotherapy for consolidation and maintenance treatment. More than 90% of isolates from first episodes of cryptococcal disease had a fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤4 μg/ml in a Gauteng population-based surveillance study of Cryptococcus neoformans in 2007-2008. We assessed whether fluconazole resistance had emerged in clinical cryptococcal isolates over a decade. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsWe prospectively collected C. neoformans isolates from 1 January through 31 March 2017 from persons with a first episode of culture-confirmed cryptococcal disease at 37 South African hospitals. Isolates were phenotypically confirmed to C. neoformans species-complex level. We determined fluconazole MICs (range: 0.125 μg/ml to 64 μg/ml) of 229 C. neoformans isolates using custom-made broth microdilution panels prepared, inoculated and read according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A3 and M60 recommendations. These MIC values were compared to MICs of 249 isolates from earlier surveillance (2007-2008). Clinical data were collected from patients during both surveillance periods. There were more males (61% vs 39%) and more participants on combination induction antifungal treatment (92% vs 32%) in 2017 compared to 2007-2008. The fluconazole MIC50, MIC90 and geometric mean MIC was 4 μg/ml, 8 μg/ml and 4.11 μg/ml in 2017 (n = 229) compared to 1 μg/ml, 2 μg/ml and 2.08 μg/ml in 2007-2008 (n = 249) respectively. Voriconazole, itraconazole and posaconazole Etests were performed on 16 of 229 (7%) C. neoformans isolates with a fluconazole MIC value of ≥16 μg/ml; only one had MIC values of >32 μg/ml for these three antifungal agents. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Fluconazole MIC50 and MIC90 values were two-fold higher in 2017 compared to 2007-2008. Although there are no breakpoints, higher fluconazole doses may be required to maintain efficacy of standard treatment regimens for cryptococcal meningitis.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalAdultAntifungal AgentsCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansFemaleFluconazoleHospitalsHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesSouth AfricaAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID32231354
PMCPMC7108701
OpenAlexW3013514724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.