Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32231340›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2020

Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder-decoder framework.

Joseph G Makin, David A Moses, Edward F Chang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 315 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph G MakinCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA. makin@phy.ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-7006
David A MosesCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Edward F ChangCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA. edward.chang@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-4700
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Functional Architecture of Speech Motor CortexU01NS098971 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHANG, EDWARD · 2016 to 2018
$3.5M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS098971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decade after speech was first decoded from human brain signals, accuracy and speed remain far below that of natural speech. Here we show how to decode the electrocorticogram with high accuracy and at natural-speech rates. Taking a cue from recent advances in machine translation, we train a recurrent neural network to encode each sentence-length sequence of neural activity into an abstract representation, and then to decode this representation, word by word, into an English sentence. For each participant, data consist of several spoken repeats of a set of 30-50 sentences, along with the contemporaneous signals from ~250 electrodes distributed over peri-Sylvian cortices. Average word error rates across a held-out repeat set are as low as 3%. Finally, we show how decoding with limited data can be improved with transfer learning, by training certain layers of the network under multiple participants' data.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural Networks, ComputerSpeechSpeech PerceptionAdultBrainElectrocorticographyFemaleHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32231340
PMCPMC10560395
OpenAlexW3013691153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.