ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2020
Evaluation and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 355 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
355 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 637 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Advances in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic and Mechanistic Evidence.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Pooled it
- The role of SGLT 2 inhibitors in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Left atrial volume quantification by transthoracic echocardiography versus cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Improvement of Hemodynamics and Quality of Life Before and After Interatrial Shunt Devices Implantation for Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis to predict mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Development and validation of the HF-DANAS score.ESC heart failure · 2024Pooled it
- The prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Discovering Distinct Phenotypical Clusters in Heart Failure Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum: a Systematic Review.Current heart failure reports · 2023Pooled it
- Validation of heart failure algorithm for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of statins on functional capacity and cardiac remodeling in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a randomized open-label pilot trial.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Trial
- Exercise-Induced Left Atrial Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.JACC. Heart failure · 2023Trial
- Diastolic contributors in cardiomyocytes of a cardiometabolic HFpEF-like mouse model.The Journal of general physiology · 2026Article
- Engineering the geriatric heart to model HFpEF.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- CardioMOD-Net: A Modal Decomposition-Neural Network Framework for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction from Echocardiography Cine Loops.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Integration of multiple perspectives to understand the left ventricular pressure-volume relationship.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Understanding atrial failure: from diagnosis to clinical implications.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in HFpEF: Distinguishing Drug-Specific Response from Prognostic Phenotypes Across Randomized Trials.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Assessment of Exercise Intolerance and Evaluation for HFpEF: A Literature Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Review
- Applications of Left Atrial Strain in Cardiovascular Disease: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Evidence.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Echocardiographic Phenomapping in HFpEF: From Imaging Biomarkers to Precision Cardiovascular Medicine.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Review
295 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has grown to become the dominant form of heart failure worldwide, in tandem with ageing of the general population and the increasing prevalences of obesity, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The clinical syndrome of HFpEF is heterogeneous and must be distinguished from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction as well as other aetiologies that have different treatment strategies. The diagnosis of HFpEF is challenging and ultimately relates to the conceptual definition of heart failure as a clinical syndrome characterized by symptoms that are associated with a reduced capacity of the heart to pump blood adequately at normal filling pressures during diastole. Clinical trials to date have been largely unsuccessful in identifying effective treatments for HFpEF but evidence supports the use of diuretics, mineralocorticoid antagonists and lifestyle interventions. Pathophysiological heterogeneity in the presentation of HFpEF is substantial, and ongoing studies are underway to evaluate the optimal methods to classify patients into phenotypically homogeneous subpopulations to facilitate better individualization of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.