Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32231311›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2020

Pro-neuronal activity of Myod1 due to promiscuous binding to neuronal genes.

Qian Yi Lee, Moritz Mall, Soham Chanda, Bo Zhou, Kylesh S Sharma, Katie Schaukowitch, Juan M Adrian-Segarra, Sarah D Grieder, Michael S Kareta, Orly L Wapinski and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Generation of human excitatory forebrain neurons by cooperative binding of proneural NGN2 and homeobox factor EMX1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Next-generation direct reprogramming.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Insights and applications of direct neuronal reprogramming.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Qian Yi Lee *Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Moritz Mall *Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1278-2594
Soham ChandaInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Bo ZhouInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2082-7737
Kylesh S SharmaInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Katie SchaukowitchInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Juan M Adrian-SegarraCell Fate Engineering and Disease Modeling Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-0554
Sarah D GriederInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michael S KaretaInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6980-9065
Orly L WapinskiCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Cheen Euong AngDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9050-6122
Rui LiCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Thomas C SüdhofCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Department of Genetics, Department of Dermatology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Howard Y ChangCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9459-4393
Marius WernigInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. wernig@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-515X
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USGerman Cancer Research Center · DEAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

The Impact of PD-1 Inhibition on Immune-Response to ChemoradiotherapyP20GM103548 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH/USD · PI MISKIMINS, W KEITH · 2012 to 2020
$20.8M
High Throughput DNA Sequencer UpgradeS10OD018220 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, JOHN · 2014 to 2014
$596k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103548NIH HHS S10 OD018220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The on-target pioneer factors Ascl1 and Myod1 are sequence-related but induce two developmentally unrelated lineages-that is, neuronal and muscle identities, respectively. It is unclear how these two basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) factors mediate such fundamentally different outcomes. The chromatin binding of Ascl1 and Myod1 was surprisingly similar in fibroblasts, yet their transcriptional outputs were drastically different. We found that quantitative binding differences explained differential chromatin remodelling and gene activation. Although strong Ascl1 binding was exclusively associated with bHLH motifs, strong Myod1-binding sites were co-enriched with non-bHLH motifs, possibly explaining why Ascl1 is less context dependent. Finally, we observed that promiscuous binding of Myod1 to neuronal targets results in neuronal reprogramming when the muscle program is inhibited by Myt1l. Our findings suggest that chromatin access of on-target pioneer factors is primarily driven by the protein-DNA interaction, unlike ordinary context-dependent transcription factors, and that promiscuous transcription factor binding requires specific silencing mechanisms to ensure lineage fidelity.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBinding SitesCell LineageCellular ReprogrammingChromatinEmbryo, MammalianFibroblastsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMyoD ProteinNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsNucleotide MotifsAscl1 protein, mouseBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsChromatinMyoD1 myogenic differentiation proteinMyoD ProteinMyt1l protein, mouseNerve Tissue ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID32231311
OpenAlexW3013883054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.