ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Bearing Fault Diagnosis of Induction Motors Using a Genetic Algorithm and Machine Learning Classifiers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- CNN Bearing Fault Diagnosis Based on Symmetric Point Pattern Feature Fusion with Multi-Source Resonance Sparse Components.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- KG-SR-LLM: Knowledge-Guided Semantic Representation and Large Language Model Framework for Cross-Domain Bearing Fault Diagnosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Fault Diagnosis of Electric Machines.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An efficient bearing fault detection strategy based on a hybrid machine learning technique.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning based gasket fault detection: a CNN approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fault Detection in Induction Machines Using Learning Models and Fourier Spectrum Image Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Hybrid deep learning framework for real-time fault detection in squirrel-cage induction motors.PloS one · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in financial market prediction: advancements in machine learning for stock price forecasting.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Machine learning based fault classification for improved induction motor performance.PloS one · 2025Article
- Advanced Bearing-Fault Diagnosis and Classification Using Mel-Scalograms and FOX-Optimized ANN.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- ResNet diagnosis of rotor faults in oil transfer pumps.Heliyon · 2024Article
- FPGA-Microprocessor Based Sensor for Faults Detection in Induction Motors Using Time-Frequency and Machine Learning Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Machine learning and deep learning-based approach to categorize Bengali comments on social networks using fused dataset.PloS one · 2024Article
- A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Fault Diagnosis of Broken Rotor Bars in Induction Motors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- From Corrective to Predictive Maintenance-A Review of Maintenance Approaches for the Power Industry.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- MAB-DrNet: Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method Based on an Improved Dilated Convolutional Neural Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An Analysis of the Influence of Surface Roughness and Clearance on the Dynamic Behavior of Deep Groove Ball Bearings Using Artificial Neural Networks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Intelligent Health Assessment of Aviation Bearing Based on Deep Transfer Graph Convolutional Networks under Large Speed Fluctuations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Edge Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Fault Diagnosis in Electrical Machines.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Efficient fault diagnosis of electrical and mechanical anomalies in induction motors (IMs) is challenging but necessary to ensure safety and economical operation in industries. Research has shown that bearing faults are the most frequently occurring faults in IMs. The vibration signals carry rich information about bearing health conditions and are commonly utilized for fault diagnosis in bearings. However, collecting these signals is expensive and sometimes impractical because it requires the use of external sensors. The external sensors demand enough space and are difficult to install in inaccessible sites. To overcome these disadvantages, motor current signal-based bearing fault diagnosis methods offer an attractive solution. As such, this paper proposes a hybrid motor-current data-driven approach that utilizes statistical features, genetic algorithm (GA) and machine learning models for bearing fault diagnosis. First, the statistical features are extracted from the motor current signals. Second, the GA is utilized to reduce the number of features and select the most important ones from the feature database. Finally, three different classification algorithms namely KNN, decision tree, and random forest, are trained and tested using these features in order to evaluate the bearing faults. This combination of techniques increases the accuracy and reduces the computational complexity. The experimental results show that the three classifiers achieve an accuracy of more than 97%. In addition, the evaluation parameters such as precision, F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity show better performance. Finally, to validate the efficiency of the proposed model, it is compared with some recently adopted techniques. The comparison results demonstrate that the suggested technique is promising for diagnosis of IM bearing faults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.