Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32231054›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Improving Education and Training to Reduce the Burden of Occupational Cancer. The Riga-European Association of Schools of Occupational Medicine (EASOM) Statement on Work-Related Cancer.

Begoña Martínez-Jarreta, Nicole Majery, Petar Bulat, Soile Jungewelter, Elena-Ana Păuncu, Dieter Weigel, Marija Bubas, Alenka Škerjanc, Ivars Vanadzins, Maija Eglite and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Update on Occupational Cancer for Better Cancer Prevention and Control.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 10 countries.

Begoña Martínez-JarretaOccupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zaragoza and Scientific Research Group GIIS-063 (IIS-Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6469-9189
Nicole MajeryService du Santé au Travail, Multisectoriel (STM), 1630 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Petar BulatDepartment of Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-4311-8960
Soile JungewelterFinnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), FI-00250 Helsinki, Finland.
Elena-Ana PăuncuDiscipline of Occupational Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes", 300041 Timişoara, Romania.
Dieter WeigelAcademy of Occupational Medicine and Public Health, 12159 Berlin, Germany.
Marija BubasCroatian Institute of Public Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Alenka ŠkerjancClinical Institute of Occupational Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivars VanadzinsInstitute of Occupational Safety and Environmental Health, Riga Stradins University, LV1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-1583
Maija EgliteDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Riga Stradins University, LV1007 Riga, Latvia.
Marcos LarrosaInternal Medicine Department, University Hospital Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Susan Jill StocksHealth Services Research & Primary Care, Division of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Lode GodderisCentre for Environment and Health, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4764-8835
Riga Stradiņš University · LVFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESHrvatski zavod za javno zdravstvo · HRKU Leuven · BELaboratoire National de Santé · LUUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Manchester · GBVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing the burden of occupational cancers (OCs) is currently one of the most challenging Occupational Health (OH) issues. The European Union (EU) has made efforts to improve the existing legal framework and developed specific legislation aimed at reducing the burden of OC. However, available data suggest that OC are underreported. In August 2019, the European Association of Schools of Occupational Medicine (EASOM) adopted a statement that highlighted the importance of improving the education and training of Medical Doctors (MDs) to facilitate improvements in recognizing and reporting OC. To achieve this, EASOM proposes to promote OH education and training of MDs at undergraduate and postgraduate levels, foster harmonization of OH education and teaching standards and programs across EU countries, and enhance cooperation between universities and international scientific associations. Finally, we suggest that occupational data should be recorded in cancer and medical registers. By engaging MDs more fully in the debate about OCs, they will become more aware of the Occupational Physician's role in reducing the burden of OCs and, furthermore, embed consideration of occupation as a potential cause of cancer into their own practice. These interventions will help promote the implementation of policies and interventions aimed to reduce OC in the workplace.

Indexed as

European UnionHumansNeoplasmsOccupational DiseasesOccupational MedicineWorkplaceEASOMeducation and trainingoccupational cancerpreventionwork related cancer

Identifiers

PMID32231054
PMCPMC7178232
OpenAlexW3013070562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.