Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32230921›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Outcomes According to MSKCC Risk Score with Focus on the Intermediate-Risk Group in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with First-Line Sunitinib: A Retrospective Analysis of 2390 Patients.

Ondrej Fiala, Jindrich Finek, Alexandr Poprach, Bohuslav Melichar, Jindrich Kopecký, Milada Zemanova, Katerina Kopeckova, Tomas Mlcoch, Tomas Dolezal, Lenka Capkova and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ondrej FialaDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 80, 304 60 Pilsen, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4096-7385
Jindrich FinekDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 80, 304 60 Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Alexandr PoprachDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic.
Bohuslav MelicharDepartment of Oncology, Palacky University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, I.P. Pavlova 6, 775 20 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jindrich KopeckýDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 50005 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4126-0410
Milada ZemanovaDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, U Nemocnice 499/2, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Katerina KopeckovaDepartment of Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, V Uvalu 84, 150 06 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas MlcochInstitute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment (iHETA), Vaclavska 316/12, 120 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas DolezalInstitute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment (iHETA), Vaclavska 316/12, 120 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Lenka CapkovaInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Poštovská 68/3, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomas BuchlerDepartment of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 140 59 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007280Horizon 2020 Nº856620Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LO1503Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky NV19-08-00250undefined <span style="color:gray;font-size:10px;">undefined</span> National Sustainability Program I (NPU I) Nr. LO1503Univerzita Karlova v Praze Progres Q39
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic model has been widely used for the prediction of the outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with systemic therapies, however, data from large studies are limited. This study aimed at the evaluation of the impact of the MSKCC score on the outcomes in mRCC patients treated with first-line sunitinib, with a focus on the intermediate-risk group.

methodsClinical data from 2390 mRCC patients were analysed retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were analysed according to the MSKCC risk score.

resultsORR, median PFS, and OS for patients with one risk factor were 26.7%, 10.1, and 28.2 months versus 18.7%, 6.2, and 16.2 months, respectively, for those with two risk factors (ORR:

conclusionsThe results of the present retrospective study demonstrate the suitability of the MSKCC model in mRCC patients treated with first-line sunitinib and suggest different outcomes between patients with one or two risk factors.

Indexed as

first lineMemorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center riskoutcomerenal cell carcinomasunitinib

Identifiers

PMID32230921
PMCPMC7225945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.