Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32230891›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

A Scoping Review: The Impact of Housing Systems and Environmental Features on Beef Cattle Welfare.

Rachel M Park, Margaret Foster, Courtney L Daigle

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Welfare of beef cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current Knowledge on River Buffalo Meat: A Critical Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel M ParkDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Margaret FosterMedical Sciences Library, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4453-7788
Courtney L DaigleDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Housing systems and environmental features can influence beef cattle welfare. To date, little information has been synthesized on this topic. The aim of this scoping review was to examine the relationship between housing and welfare status, so that beef cattle producers and animal scientists can make informed decisions regarding how their housing choices could impact beef cattle welfare. Housing features were categorized by floor type, space allowance and shade availability, as well as the inclusion of enrichment devices or ventilation features. Evaluation of space allowances across feedlot environments determined behavioral and production benefits when cattle were housed between 2.5 m

Indexed as

beef cattleenvironmental enrichmentfloor typehousingshadespace allowanceventilationwelfare

Identifiers

PMID32230891
PMCPMC7222360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.