Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32230782›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2020

The Lymphoscintigraphic Study of Unpredictable Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma Lymphatic Drainage.

Valentina Lavelli, Cristina Ferrari, Giulia Santo, Corinna Altini, Andrea Ballini, Angela Sardaro, Margherita Fanelli, Antonio Rosario Pisani, Anna Giulia Nappi, Giuseppe Giudice and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advantages of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Early-Stage Malignant Head-and-Neck Skin Tumors.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Valentina LavelliNuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine-University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Cristina FerrariNuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine-University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Giulia SantoNuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine-University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Corinna AltiniNuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine-University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Andrea BalliniDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, Campus Universitario "Ernesto Quagliariello", University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70125 Bari, Italy.
Angela SardaroInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11-70124, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Margherita FanelliNuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine-University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Antonio Rosario PisaniNuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine-University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Anna Giulia NappiNuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine-University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe GiudiceDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe RubiniNuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine-University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM) does not always follow standard lymphatic drainage; typical expected lymphatic pathways are associated with unexpected ones. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between the primary HNCM sites and all possible lymphatic drainage pathways by lymphoscintigraphy with a special focus on the unexpected sentinel lymph node (SLNs) detection. We retrospectively analyzed 67 patients (46 M, 21 F; mean age 63 years) who underwent lymphoscintigraphy from January 2004 to November 2018. 99mTc-serum albumin was injected intra-dermally at the dose of 18-37 MBq in 0.2-0.4 mL. All patients underwent dynamic and static image acquisition. For all patients, the relation between the expected and unexpected SLNs was performed using the "Sidney Melanoma Unit Database" as our reference. The relation was performed also according to the primary HNCM localization. Cohens' kappa was calculated. In 61/67 (91%) of patients, SLNs were detected only in predictable sites, while in six/67 (9%), unexpected SLNs were revealed. In all patients, the agreement proportion was 91% (95% confidence interval CI 0.8-0.96) and Cohen's K was 0.11 (95% CI 0-0.43). Regarding the primary melanoma sites, the nasolabial field HNCM showed the highest rate of concordance (K = 0.60; 95%, CI 0.32-0.89) while the preauricular region HNCM revealed the highest rate of discordance with the clinically predictable drainage. The HNCM lymphatic drainage is extremely variable in regard to both the sites and the number of involved SLNs. The lymphoscintigraphic study is highly recommended to identify all possible SLNs in order to perform an accurate staging for all patients and to avoid missing unexpected SLNs.

Indexed as

field cancerizationHead and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma (HNCM)lymphatic drainageSidney Melanoma Unit Database

Identifiers

PMID32230782
PMCPMC7235790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.