Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32230765›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Investigating the Palatability of Lamb and Beef Components Used in the Production of Pet Food for Cats.

Pavinee Watson, David Thomas, Adrian Hoggard, Michael Parker, Nicola Schreurs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gaps and Controversies in Feline Food Palatability.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pavinee WatsonSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
David ThomasSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7460-9351
Adrian HoggardZiwi Ltd., Mount Maunganui 3116, New Zealand.
Michael ParkerSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
Nicola SchreursSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3381-9448

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pet food industry continues to utilise large amounts of inedible meat components from the human food industry. Although used extensively in pet food formulations and as palatants, little is known about the palatability of individual meat components. The objectives of this study were to investigate the palatability of raw meat components commonly used in the production of pet food, using acceptance and preference testing. Those examined were lung, heart, kidney, tripe, liver and mechanically deboned meat (MDM) from lamb and beef. Two-bowl acceptance tests were used to develop an overall ranking of components within each species. Two-bowl preference tests between equivalent beef and lamb components were then used to determine whether a preference was exhibited for one species over the other. For the acceptance of components from lamb and beef, liver was the most palatable within both species, with kidney equivalent to liver when testing lamb components. The MDM was identified as the least palatable component from both species. When examining the preference between equivalent components between species, cats showed preferences for lamb over equivalent beef components, except for heart and liver which showed no difference in intake between the two species. Overall, cats were able to clearly rank the palatability of different components from lamb and beef, as well as between equivalent components from the two species. Selecting highly palatable ingredients whilst still meeting pet food manufacturing guidelines may play a role in improving overall diet palatability and acceptance by cats.

Indexed as

acceptanceby-productsdietfelineingredientsoffalorgan meatspreferencered meat

Identifiers

PMID32230765
PMCPMC7222388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.