Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32230737›Full record

ArticleViruses2020

Comparison of gE/gI- and TK/gE/gI-Gene-Deleted Pseudorabies Virus Vaccines Mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre/Lox Systems.

Jianglong Li, Kui Fang, Zhenxiang Rong, Xinxin Li, Xujiao Ren, Hui Ma, Huanchun Chen, Xiangmin Li, Ping Qian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The InactivatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Same Dosages of rPRV/XJ5-gIFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianglong LiState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Kui FangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Zhenxiang RongState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Xinxin LiState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Xujiao RenState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Hui MaState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Huanchun ChenState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Xiangmin LiState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Ping QianState Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudorabies (PR), caused by pseudorabies virus (PRV), is an acute and febrile infectious disease in swine. To eradicate PR, a more efficacious vaccine needs to be developed. Here, the gE/gI- and TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV (rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI) are constructed through CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre/Lox systems. We found that the rGXΔTK/gE/gI was safer than rGXΔgE/gI in mice. Additionally, the effects of rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI were further evaluated in swine. The rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI significantly increased numbers of IFN-γ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in swine, whereas there was no difference between rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI. Moreover, rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI promoted a PRV-specific humoral immune response. The PRV-specific humoral immune response induced by rGXΔgE/gI was consistent with that caused by rGXΔTK/gE/gI. After the challenge, swine vaccinated with rGXΔgE/gI and rGXΔTK/gE/gI showed no clinical signs and viral shedding. However, histopathological detection revealed that rGXΔgE/gI, not rGXΔTK/gE/gI, caused pathological lesions in brain and lung tissues. In summary, these results demonstrate that the TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV was safer compared with rGXΔgE/gI in swine. The data imply that the TK/gE/gI-gene-deleted recombinant PRV may be a more efficacious vaccine candidate for the prevention of PR.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene DeletionHomologous RecombinationAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, ViralFemaleGene TargetingGenetic EngineeringGenome, ViralHEK293 CellsHerpesvirus 1, SuidHumansIntegrasesMicePseudorabies VaccinesAntibodies, ViralCre recombinaseIntegrasesPseudorabies VaccinesCre/LoxCRISPR/Cas9pseudorabies virusvaccine

Identifiers

PMID32230737
PMCPMC7232343
OpenAlexW3013624840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.