Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32229603›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2020

A Sample-to-Report Solution for Taxonomic Identification of Cultured Bacteria in the Clinical Setting Based on Nanopore Sequencing.

Stefan Moritz Neuenschwander, Miguel Angel Terrazos Miani, Heiko Amlang, Carmen Perroulaz, Pascal Bittel, Carlo Casanova, Sara Droz, Jean-Pierre Flandrois, Stephen L Leib, Franziska Suter-Riniker and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nanopore sequencing and its application to the study of microbial communities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan Moritz NeuenschwanderUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland.
Miguel Angel Terrazos MianiUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland.
Heiko AmlangUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland.
Carmen PerroulazUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland.
Pascal BittelUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland.
Carlo CasanovaUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland.
Sara DrozUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland.
Jean-Pierre FlandroisUniversity of Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France.
Stephen L LeibUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1106-6123
Franziska Suter-RinikerUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland.
Alban RametteUniversity of Bern, Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bern, Switzerland alban.ramette@ifik.unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-4639
University of Bern · CHUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is commonly used for the identification of bacterial isolates in diagnostic laboratories and mostly relies on the Sanger sequencing method. The latter, however, suffers from a number of limitations, with the most significant being the inability to resolve mixed amplicons when closely related species are coamplified from a mixed culture. This often leads to either increased turnaround time or absence of usable sequence data. Short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies could solve the mixed amplicon issue but would lack both cost efficiency at low throughput and fast turnaround times. Nanopore sequencing developed by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) could solve those issues by enabling a flexible number of samples per run and an adjustable sequencing time. Here, we report on the development of a standardized laboratory workflow combined with a fully automated analysis pipeline

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingBacteriaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S RNA genebioinformaticsclinical methodsdiagnosticsnanoporesequencingtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID32229603
PMCPMC7269405
OpenAlexW3014084673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.