Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32229524›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify measures of breakthrough pain and evaluate their psychometric properties.

Katie Greenfield, Simone Holley, Daniel Eric Schoth, Julie Bayliss, Anna-Karenia Anderson, Satbir Jassal, Dilini Rajapakse, Lorna Katharine Fraser, Christine Mott, Margaret Johnson and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06790719 (Development and Validation of a Paediatric Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06790719 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development and Validation of a Paediatric Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2025 to 2025Enrolled210ConditionsBreakthrough Pain, Palliative Medicine, Oncology Pain, Pediatric ALL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Opioid conversion in adults with cancer: MASCC-ASCO-AAHPM-HPNA-NICSO guideline.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Katie GreenfieldSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8827-6543
Simone HolleySchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4631-2862
Daniel Eric SchothSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9144-8067
Julie BaylissThe Louis Dundas Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anna-Karenia AndersonPaediatric Palliative Care, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8542-4942
Satbir JassalPaediatric Palliative Care, Rainbows Hospice for Children and Young People, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK.
Dilini RajapakseThe Louis Dundas Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lorna Katharine FraserMartin House Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1360-4191
Christine MottPaediatric Palliative Care, Hummingbird House Hospice, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Margaret JohnsonPatient & Pubic Representative c/o Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ian WongSchool of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8242-0014
Richard HowardDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Emily HarropPaediatric Palliative Care, Helen & Douglas House Hospice, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2480-2062
Christina LiossiSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK cliossi@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0627-6377
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreakthrough pain is common in children and adults with cancer and other conditions, including those approaching end-of-life, although it is often poorly managed, possibly partly due to a lack of validated assessment tools. This review aims to (1) identify all available instruments measuring breakthrough pain in infants, children, adolescents or adults and (2) critically appraise, compare and summarise the quality of the psychometric properties of the identified instruments using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two searches will be carried out between October 2019 and January 2020, one for each aim of the review. The Cochrane Library, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Database, Evidence Search and OpenGrey databases will be searched from database inception until the date the search is conducted. Reference lists of eligible articles will be screened and authors in the field contacted. For search 1, articles will be screened by two reviewers by abstract, and full-text where necessary, to identify if a breakthrough pain assessment was used. Search 2 will then be conducted to identify studies evaluating measurement properties of these assessments. Two reviewers will screen articles from search 2 by title and abstract. All potentially relevant studies will be screened by full text by both reviewers. For search 2, data will be extracted in parallel with the quality assessment process, as recommended by COSMIN. Two reviewers will assess methodological quality using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist and the COSMIN updated criteria for good measurement properties. Findings will be summarised and, if possible, data will be pooled using meta-analysis. The quality of the evidence will be graded and summarised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Results of this review will be submitted for publication in a peer review journal and presented at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019155583.

Indexed as

Breakthrough PainPsychometricsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPain ManagementSystematic Reviews as Topiccancer painneurological painpain management

Identifiers

PMID32229524
PMCPMC7170606
OpenAlexW3013126458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.