Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32229495›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2020

Evaluation of the Effect of Contezolid (MRX-I) on the Corrected QT Interval in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

Junzhen Wu, Guoying Cao, Hailan Wu, Yuancheng Chen, Beining Guo, Xiaojie Wu, Jicheng Yu, Kanhong Ni, Jin Qian, Li Wang and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel oxazolidinones harbor potentFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junzhen Wu *Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guoying Cao *Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai, China.
Hailan WuInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuancheng ChenKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5731-9114
Beining GuoInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaojie WuKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai, China.
Jicheng YuKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Shanghai, China.
Kanhong NiDepartment of Cardiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jin QianDepartment of Cardiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li WangDepartment of Cardiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jufang WuInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu WangInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hong YuanInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jing ZhangInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China zhangj_fudan@aliyun.com xiyuewen@medmail.com.cn.
Yuewen XiDepartment of Cardiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China zhangj_fudan@aliyun.com xiyuewen@medmail.com.cn.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contezolid (MRX-I), a new oxazolidinone, is an antibiotic in development for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria. This was a thorough QT study conducted in 52 healthy subjects who were administered oral contezolid at a therapeutic (800 mg) dose, a supratherapeutic (1,600 mg) dose, placebo, and oral moxifloxacin at 400 mg in four separate treatment periods. The pharmacokinetic profile of contezolid was also evaluated. Time point analysis indicated that the upper bounds of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for placebo-corrected change-from-baseline QTc (ΔΔQTc) were <10 ms for the contezolid therapeutic dose at each time point. The upper bound of the 90% CI for ΔΔQTc was slightly more than 10 ms with the contezolid supratherapeutic dose at 3 and 4 h postdose, and the prolongation effect on the QT/QTc interval was less than that of the positive control, moxifloxacin, at 400 mg. At 3 and 4 h after the moxifloxacin dose, the moxifloxacin group met the assay sensitivity criteria outlined in ICH Guidance E14 by having a lower confidence bound of ≥5 ms. The results of a linear exposure-response model which were similar to that of a time point analysis demonstrated a slightly positive relationship between contezolid plasma levels and ΔQTcF interval with a slope of 0.227 ms per mg/liter (90% CI, 0.188 to 0.266). In summary, contezolid did not prolong the QT interval at a therapeutic dose and may have a slight effect on QT interval prolongation at a supratherapeutic dose.

Indexed as

FluoroquinolonesLong QT SyndromeChinaCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodElectrocardiographyHealthy VolunteersHeart RateHumansOxazolidinonesPyridonescontezolidFluoroquinolonesOxazolidinonesPyridonesconcentration-response modelcontezolidMRX-IPK/PD modelthorough QTTQT

Identifiers

PMID32229495
PMCPMC7269508
OpenAlexW3013668650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.