ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2020
Biophysical forces in membrane bending and traffic.
Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coupling of cargo to the autophagy receptor is a critical step in ER-phagy.Science advances · 2026Article
- Linking Planar Cell Polarity to Mechanotransduction During Morphogenesis.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- A model for membrane curvature generation by caveolin discs driven by differential contact interaction.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Chlamydia trachomatis invasion: a duet of effectors.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- Morphodynamical adaptation of the endolysosomal system to stress.The FEBS journal · 2025Review
- Adhesion energy controls lipid binding-mediated endocytosis.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Membrane transformations of fusion and budding.Nature communications · 2024Review
- Analyzing the cellular plasma membrane by fast and efficient correlative STED and platinum replica EM.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Strength in numbers: effect of protein crowding on the shape of cell membranes.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022Review
- Quality control mechanisms that protect nuclear envelope identity and function.The Journal of cell biology · 2022Review
- Molecular architecture of the human caveolin-1 complex.Science advances · 2022Article
- Article
- Editorial overview: Membrane traffic in the time of COVID-19.Current opinion in cell biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracellular trafficking requires extensive changes in membrane morphology. Cells use several distinct molecular factors and physical cues to remodel membranes. Here, we highlight recent advances in identifying the biophysical mechanisms of membrane curvature generation. In particular, we focus on the cooperation of molecular and physical drivers of membrane bending during three stages of vesiculation: budding, cargo selection, and scission. Taken together, the studies reviewed here emphasize that, rather than a single dominant mechanism, several mechanisms typically work in parallel during each step of membrane remodeling. Important challenges for the future of this field are to understand how multiple mechanisms work together synergistically and how a series of stochastic events can be combined to achieve a deterministic result-assembly of the trafficking vesicle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.