Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32229281›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2020

Dupilumab improves clinical manifestations, symptoms, and quality of life in adult patients with chronic nodular prurigo.

Andrea Chiricozzi, Martina Maurelli, Niccolò Gori, Giuseppe Argenziano, Clara De Simone, Giulia Calabrese, Giampiero Girolomoni, Ketty Peris

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Nemolizumab efficacy in prurigo nodularis: onset of action on itch and sleep disturbances.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prurigo Nodularis: Pathogenesis and the Horizon of Potential Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Chronic Nodular Prurigo: An Update on the Pathogenesis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea ChiricozziInstitute of Dermatology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: chiricozziandrea@gmail.com.
Martina MaurelliSection of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Niccolò GoriInstitute of Dermatology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe ArgenzianoDermatology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Clara De SimoneInstitute of Dermatology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giulia CalabreseDermatology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Giampiero GirolomoniSection of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ketty PerisInstitute of Dermatology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Verona · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic nodular prurigo (CNPG) is a multifactorial skin disease characterized by itchy papules and nodules, usually resistant to standard treatment and associated with markedly impaired quality of life.

objectiveTo describe dupilumab effectiveness and tolerability in treating adult patients with CNPG refractory to both topical and systemic therapies.

methodsRetrospective, multicenter study including adult patients affected by CNPG, who were treated with dupilumab for at least 16 weeks.

resultsTwenty-seven CNPG patients showed clinical improvement in terms of skin lesions, itch, sleeplessness, and quality of life. A consistent proportion of patients (24/27; 88.9%) had at least 16-week continuous treatment and achieved Investigator Global Assessment score 1 (11/24; 45.8%). An increased number of patients achieved at least a 2-grade reduction in Investigator Global Assessment score (19/24; 79.2%). Numeric rating scale values for itch and sleeplessness decreased from 8.9 to 2.7 and from 8.2 to 1.7, respectively (P < .001) after 16-week therapy. Ten patients achieved 36 weeks of continuous treatment while maintaining clinical efficacy. LIMITATIONS: Major limitations included lack of validated assessment tools at the initial data collection, a limited cohort of treated patients, and a short-term observation period.

conclusionDupilumab was proven effective in reducing itch and improving CNPG skin lesions.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChronic DiseaseDermatologic AgentsFemaleHumansInterleukin-4 Receptor alpha SubunitMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrurigoRetrospective StudiesSleep Wake DisordersAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDermatologic AgentsdupilumabInterleukin-4 Receptor alpha Subunitatopic dermatitisdupilumabitchnodular prurigo

Identifiers

PMID32229281
OpenAlexW3013281025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.