Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32228785›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

Functional Outcomes among a Cohort of Children in Northeastern Brazil Meeting Criteria for Follow-Up of Congenital Zika Virus Infection.

Jeanne Bertolli, Jacob Elijah Attell, Charles Rose, Cynthia A Moore, Flávio Melo, Jennifer Erin Staples, Kim Kotzky, Nevin Krishna, Ashley Satterfield-Nash, Isabela Ornelas Pereira and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Virus as Teratogenic Agents.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jeanne BertolliDivision of Human Development and Disability, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Jacob Elijah AttellEagle Global Scientific, San Antonio, Texas.
Charles RoseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Cynthia A MooreNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Flávio MeloHospital Regional de Guarabira/Governo do Estado da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Jennifer Erin StaplesDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Kim KotzkyOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Nevin KrishnaOffice of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ashley Satterfield-NashOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Isabela Ornelas PereiraTransmissible Diseases Department (DEVIT), Ministry of Health of Brazil, Brasilia, Brazil.
André PessoaHospital Infantil Albert Sabin, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Donna Camille SmithDivision of Congenital and Developmental Disorders, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ana Carolina Faria E Silva SantelliDivision of Global HIV and TB, Center for Global Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Coleen A BoyleNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Georgina PeacockDivision of Human Development and Disability, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the large outbreak of Zika virus in the Western Hemisphere, many infants have been born with congenital Zika virus infection. It is important to describe the functional outcomes seen with congenital infections to allow for their recognition and appropriate interventions. We evaluated 120 children conceived during the 2015-2016 Zika virus outbreak in Paraíba, Brazil, who were approximately 24 months old, to assess functional outcomes. All children met either anthropometric criteria or laboratory criteria suggestive of possible congenital Zika virus infection. We collected results of previous medical evaluations, interviewed parents, and performed physical examinations and functional assessments, for example, the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE). We compared patterns of neurologic outcomes and developmental delay at age 24 months by whether children met anthropometric or laboratory criteria, or both. Among children meeting both criteria, 60% (26/43) were multiply affected (had severe motor impairment, severe developmental delay, and suboptimal HINE scores), compared with 5% (3/57) meeting only laboratory criteria and none (0/20) meeting only anthropometric criteria. Of the remaining 91 children, 49% (45) had developmental delay, with more severe delay seen in children meeting both criteria. Although children meeting physical and laboratory criteria for potential congenital Zika virus infection were more severely affected, we did identify several children with notable adverse neurologic outcomes and developmental delay with no physical findings but potential laboratory evidence of Zika virus infection. Given this, all children who were potentially exposed in utero to Zika virus should be monitored in early childhood for deficits to allow for early intervention.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBrazilCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesDisease OutbreaksFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHearingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID32228785
PMCPMC7204564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.