ArticleBMC psychology2020
What influences the selection of contextual cues when starting a new routine behaviour? An exploratory study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies and Behaviour Change Techniques to Optimise Sedentary Behaviour for People with Severe Asthma: A Nominal Group Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Impact of Home Medication Management Practices on Medication Adherence.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Testing the Effect of Cue Consistency on the Past Behavior-Habit-Physical Activity Relationship.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Augmented Reality for extremity hemorrhage training: a usability study.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Effect of stage-matched educational intervention on use of institutional delivery in Northwest Ethiopia: using community readiness model.The Pan African medical journal · 2024Article
- Barriers and facilitators of antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence habit formation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from a qualitative study in Kampala, Uganda.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2023Article
- A Participatory Sensing Study to Understand the Problems Older Adults Faced in Developing Medication-Taking Habits.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The role of home medication storage location in increasing medication adherence for middle-aged and older adults.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Lessons Learned From VHA's Rapid Implementation of Virtual Whole Health Peer-Led Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Staff Perspectives.Global advances in health and medicine · 2022Article
- Medication transitions: Vulnerable periods of change in need of human factors and ergonomics.Applied ergonomics · 2021Article
- Habit Formation in Older Adults.American journal of lifestyle medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContextual cues play an important role in facilitating behaviour change. They not only support memory but may also help to make the new behaviour automatic through the formation of new routines. However, previous research shows that when people start a new behaviour, they tend to select cues that lack effectiveness for prompting behaviour. Therefore, it is important to understand what influences cue selection, as this can help to identify acceptable cues, which in turn could inform future behaviour change interventions to help people select cues that best fit their context and so ensure continued repetition.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study to investigate what cues people select, how, and what influences their decisions. We recruited 39 participants and asked them to take vitamin C tablets daily for 3 weeks and later interviewed them about their experience. Quantitative habit strength and memory measures were taken for descriptive purposes.
resultsCue selection was primarily influenced by a desire to minimise effort, e.g. keeping related objects at hand or in a visible place; prior experience with similar behaviours (regardless of whether the cues used in the past were reliable or not); and beliefs about effective approaches. In addition, we found that suboptimal remembering strategies involved reliance on a single cue and loosely defined plans that do not specify cues. Moreover, for many participants, identifying optimal cues required trial and error, as people were rarely able to anticipate in advance what approach would work best for them.
conclusionsFuture behaviour change interventions that rely on routine behaviours might fruitfully include the provision of educational information regarding what approaches are suboptimal (single factors, vaguely defined plans) and what is most likely to work (combining multiple clearly defined cues). They should also assess people's existing beliefs about how to best remember specific behaviours as such beliefs can either enhance or inhibit the cues they select. Finally, interventions should account for the fact that early failures to remember are part of the process of developing a reliable remembering strategy and to be expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.