Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32228721›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2020

What influences the selection of contextual cues when starting a new routine behaviour? An exploratory study.

Katarzyna Stawarz, Benjamin Gardner, Anna Cox, Ann Blandford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Habit Formation in Older Adults.American journal of lifestyle medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katarzyna StawarzBristol Interaction Group, University of Bristol, Queen's Building, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TR, UK. k.stawarz@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9021-0615
Benjamin GardnerDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Anna CoxUCL Interaction Centre, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6EA, UK.
Ann BlandfordUCL Interaction Centre, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6EA, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Doctoral Training GrantEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/G059063/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContextual cues play an important role in facilitating behaviour change. They not only support memory but may also help to make the new behaviour automatic through the formation of new routines. However, previous research shows that when people start a new behaviour, they tend to select cues that lack effectiveness for prompting behaviour. Therefore, it is important to understand what influences cue selection, as this can help to identify acceptable cues, which in turn could inform future behaviour change interventions to help people select cues that best fit their context and so ensure continued repetition.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study to investigate what cues people select, how, and what influences their decisions. We recruited 39 participants and asked them to take vitamin C tablets daily for 3 weeks and later interviewed them about their experience. Quantitative habit strength and memory measures were taken for descriptive purposes.

resultsCue selection was primarily influenced by a desire to minimise effort, e.g. keeping related objects at hand or in a visible place; prior experience with similar behaviours (regardless of whether the cues used in the past were reliable or not); and beliefs about effective approaches. In addition, we found that suboptimal remembering strategies involved reliance on a single cue and loosely defined plans that do not specify cues. Moreover, for many participants, identifying optimal cues required trial and error, as people were rarely able to anticipate in advance what approach would work best for them.

conclusionsFuture behaviour change interventions that rely on routine behaviours might fruitfully include the provision of educational information regarding what approaches are suboptimal (single factors, vaguely defined plans) and what is most likely to work (combining multiple clearly defined cues). They should also assess people's existing beliefs about how to best remember specific behaviours as such beliefs can either enhance or inhibit the cues they select. Finally, interventions should account for the fact that early failures to remember are part of the process of developing a reliable remembering strategy and to be expected.

Indexed as

CuesHabitsAdultAscorbic AcidFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceQualitative ResearchVitaminsYoung AdultAscorbic AcidVitaminsBehaviour changeContextual cuesDigital interventionsHabit formationMemory support

Identifiers

PMID32228721
PMCPMC7106637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.