Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32228716›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2020

Critical methodological considerations in recruiting and engaging non-native English speaking workers with a head injury: a Canadian perspective.

B Nowrouzi-Kia, B Sharma, J Lewko, A Colantonio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

B Nowrouzi-KiaCentre for Research in Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada. behdin@yorku.ca.
B SharmaToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
J LewkoCentre for Research in Human Development, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada.
A ColantonioRehabilitation Science Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Laurentian University · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAYork University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes for Health Research CGW-126580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNon-native English speaking workers with a mild work-related traumatic brain and/or head injury are a vulnerable and underrepresented population in research studies. The researchers present their experiences with recruiting and performing qualitative interviews with non-native English speaking individuals with a work-related mild traumatic brain injury, and provide recommendations on how to better include this vulnerable population in future research studies. This paper presents considerations regarding ethics, recruitment challenges, interview preparation and debriefing, sex & gender and language and cultural issues must be made when working with this vulnerable population.

resultsThe researchers discuss critical issues and provide recommendations in recruiting and engaging with non-native English language workers including ethics, recruitment challenges, interview preparation and debriefing, sex & gender and language, and cultural considerations that must be made when working with this population. The study recommendations advise investigators to spend more time to learn about the non-native English participants in the mild wrTBI context, to be familiar with the vulnerabilities and specific circumstances that these workers experience. By increasing their awareness of the challenging facing this vulnerable population, the intention is to provide better care and treatment options through evidence-based research and practice.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCraniocerebral TraumaCultural CompetencyInterview, PsychologicalOccupational InjuriesPatient SelectionResearcher-Subject RelationsAdultCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioQualitative ResearchHead injuryInterviewsMethodological considerationsOccupational injuryQualitativeTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32228716
PMCPMC7106822
OpenAlexW3013931147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.