ArticleBMC oral health2020
Survival and success of implants in a private periodontal practice: a 10 year retrospective study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06534398 (Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions. A Retrospective Study With a Follow-up of at Least 10 Years.), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions. A Retrospective Study With a Follow-up of at Least 10 Years.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- What is the prevalence of peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2022Pooled it
- Bone defect development in experimental canine peri-implantitis models: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- What is the survival rate of deciduous molars in cases with agenesis of premolar successors? A systematic review.The Angle orthodontist · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical and Radiographic Changes at Implants Supporting Fixed Partial Dental Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions. A Retrospective Study After at Least 10 Years of Loading.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Assisted Diagnostic System: Implant Brand Detection Using Improved IB-YOLOv10 in Periapical Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Long-Term Clinical Study on Sandblasted-Acid-Etched Surface Dental Implants: 12-Year Follow-Up.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Long-Term Efficacy of Chlorhexidine Gel in Single-Crown Implant Rehabilitation: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
- Assessment of Various Risk Factors for Biological and Mechanical/Technical Complications in Fixed Implant Prosthetic Therapy: A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Is Laser Therapy an Adjuvant in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis? A Randomized Clinical Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Host-microbiome interactions regarding peri-implantitis and dental implant loss.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Review
- Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Implant Prostheses in Partially and Totally Edentulous Patients.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Selection of 1-mm venting or 2.5-mm screw access holes on implant crowns based on cement extrusion and retention capacity.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Comparison of Two Risk Assessment Scores in Predicting Peri-Implantitis Occurrence during Implant Maintenance in Patients Treated for Periodontal Diseases: A Long-Term Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Influence of Periodontitis, Implant, and Prosthesis Characteristics on the Peri-Implant Status: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- Efficacy of 0.05% Chlorhexidine and 0.05% Cetylpyridinium Chloride Mouthwash to Eliminate Living Bacteria on In Situ Collected Biofilms: An In Vitro Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 10 years after implant placement.BMC oral health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo assess long-term results of implants (XiVE/Frialit-2 Synchro) in a private periodontal practice according to survival and success rates (biological and technical complications) and to detect possible influencing factors, retrospectively.
methodsImplant placement of at least one implant took place 10 years ±6 months before clinical and radiographic re-examination. Incidence of implant loss as main and incidence of mucositis/ peri-implantitis as secondary outcome were detected. Also, patient-related and implant-related influencing factors were determined by regression analyses.
results100 patients (59.0% female) with 242 implants were included into analysis. Survival rate was 94.0% (XiVE: 97.7%; Frialit-2-Synchro: 66.7%). Mucositis was found in 77.6% of all patients, moderate/severe peri-implantitis in 16.3%. In logistic regression analyses statistically significant influencing factors for implant loss was implant type (p < 0.001), for mucositis a wider implant diameter (p = 0.0438) and a high modified Plaque Index (p = 0.0253), for peri-implantits number of implants per patient (p = 0.0075) and a wider implant diameter (p = 0.0079). Technical complications were found in 47 implants (19.4%).
conclusionsXiVE implants showed a high survival rate over a 10-year follow-up, on the other hand Frialit-2 Synchro implants had worse survival rates. Success rates regarding biological complications are in line with other implant systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.