Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32228633›Full record

ReviewFluids and barriers of the CNS2020

In vitro modeling of blood-brain barrier and interface functions in neuroimmune communication.

Michelle A Erickson, Miranda L Wilson, William A Banks

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle A EricksonGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-1594
Miranda L WilsonGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
William A BanksGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA. wabanks1@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

Characterization of a human in vitro blood-brain barrier model to study the effects of systemic aging on responses to Alzheimer's disease effectorsR21AG065928 · NIA · SEATTLE INST FOR BIOMEDICAL/CLINICAL RES · PI ERICKSON, MICHELLE A. · 2020 to 2020
$374k
National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21AG065928NIA NIH HHS R21 AG065928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimmune communication contributes to both baseline and adaptive physiological functions, as well as disease states. The vascular blood-brain barrier (BBB) and associated cells of the neurovascular unit (NVU) serve as an important interface for immune communication between the brain and periphery through the blood. Immune functions and interactions of the BBB and NVU in this context can be categorized into at least five neuroimmune axes, which include (1) immune modulation of BBB impermeability, (2) immune regulation of BBB transporters, secretions, and other functions, (3) BBB uptake and transport of immunoactive substances, (4) immune cell trafficking, and (5) BBB secretions of immunoactive substances. These axes may act separately or in concert to mediate various aspects of immune signaling at the BBB. Much of what we understand about immune axes has been from work conducted using in vitro BBB models, and recent advances in BBB and NVU modeling highlight the potential of these newer models for improving our understanding of how the brain and immune system communicate. In this review, we discuss how conventional in vitro models of the BBB have improved our understanding of the 5 neuroimmune axes. We further evaluate the existing literature on neuroimmune functions of novel in vitro BBB models, such as those derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and discuss their utility in evaluating aspects of neuroimmune communication.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierCytokinesInflammationModels, BiologicalNeuroimmunomodulationNeurovascular CouplingAnimalsHumansCytokinesBlood–brain barrierChemokinesCytokinesIn vitroLeukocyte traffickingNeuroimmuneNeuroinflammationNeurovascular unit

Identifiers

PMID32228633
PMCPMC7106666
OpenAlexW3013733837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.