SynthesisBMC medical education2020
Preferences of nursing and medical students for working with older adults and people with dementia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Is Going on? The Purpose, Organisation and Supervision of Australian First-Year Nursing Students on Clinical Placements in Nursing Homes.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Older Adult Care Career Intention and Associated Factors Among Higher Vocational College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Attitudes towards and willingness to work with older adults among nurses in a university hospital, Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Student satisfaction of a dementia education intervention: a cross-sectional study of the time for dementia programme.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Experiences of Dietetic Students Taking Part in an Online Longitudinal Dementia Educational Programme: A Qualitative Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
- Securing tomorrow's workforce: insights from a Danish survey on factors influencing junior doctors' specialization in geriatric medicine.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Examining final-year healthcare students' willingness to work with older adults: a mediator-moderator analysis of knowledge, ageism, and grandparental relationships.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- An Introduction to the Artificial Intelligence-Driven Technology Adoption in Nursing Education Conceptual Framework: A Mixed-Methods Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- A qualitative exploration of gaps in undergraduate gerontological nursing courses and recommendations for change.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Long-term Outcomes of Geriatric Medicine Teaching Strategies: Comparing no Content, Traditional Lecture, and Flipped Classroom 2 Years Postintervention.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Education Program for Enhancing Health Care Students' Attitudes Toward People Living With Dementia: Protocol for a Single-Arm Pre-Post Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Geriatric Care Among Health Care Professionals in Kumasi, Ghana.Health services insights · 2024Article
- Factors associated with dementia attitudes in an adolescent cohort: Structural Equation Modelling.Cogent psychology · 2023Article
- Female Saudi nursing student perspectives on pursuing a career in home healthcare: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Translating 'dementia friends' programme to undergraduate medical and nursing practice: a qualitative exploration.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- The role of awards in promoting educational leadership in nursing: A qualitative descriptive study in gerontological nursing.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Graduating nurse students' interest in older people nursing-A cross-sectional survey in six European countries.International journal of older people nursing · 2022Article
- Preferences of newly qualified healthcare professionals for working with people with dementia: a qualitative study.Age and ageing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA current issue in workforce planning is ensuring healthcare professionals are both competent and willing to work with older adults with complex needs. This includes dementia care, which is widely recognised as a priority. Yet research suggests that working with older people is unattractive to undergraduate healthcare students.
methodsThe aim of this systematic review and narrative synthesis is to explore the factors related to healthcare (medical and nursing) student preferences' for working with older people and people with dementia. Searches were conducted in five databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINHAL, BNI, ERIC. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. A narrative, data-based convergent synthesis was conducted.
resultsOne thousand twenty-four papers were screened (139 full texts) and 62 papers were included for a narrative synthesis. Factors were grouped into seven categories; student characteristics, experiences of students, course characteristics, career characteristics, patient characteristics, work characteristics and the theory of planned behaviour.
conclusionHealth educators should review their role in cultivating student interest in working with older adults, with consideration of student preparation and the perceived value of this work. There is a lack of evidence about the career preferences of students in relation to dementia, and this warrants further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.