SynthesisBMC medical education2020
A systematic review of the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
213 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 716 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies on Youth Internet Behavior Using the Positive Youth Development Frameworks.Journal of adolescence · 2026Pooled it
- Blended learning in medical education in India-a literature-based analysis and description.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Evidence of the effectiveness of projects, programs, and/or strategies for curricular innovation in undergraduate health courses: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Identifying Research Priorities in Digital Education for Health Care: Umbrella Review and Modified Delphi Method Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Learning Outcomes of e-Learning in Psychotherapy Training and Comparison With Conventional Training Methods: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Equitable and accessible informed healthcare consent process for people with intellectual disability: a systematic literature review.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Pooled it
- More than surgical tools: a systematic review of robots as didactic tools for the education of professionals in health sciences.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2022Pooled it
- Publication activities relating to digital teaching and learning in the GMS Journal for Medical Education - a descriptive analysis (1984-2020).GMS journal for medical education · 2022Pooled it
- Preserving professional identities, behaviors, and values in digital professionalism using social networking sites; a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2021Pooled it
- The scope of dental education during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.Journal of dental education · 2021Pooled it
- Teaching Acute Coronary Syndrome High-Risk ECG Interpretation and Clinical Decision-Making Through FOAMed Videos and Podcast Versus Print-Based Materials Among Emergency Care Providers: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Trial
- Utilising a web-based e-learning platform for orthodontic case analysis training: a randomised controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Educational program on cancer cachexia for nurses: a pilot randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Primary Care Providers' Perceptions of the CAPACITI Palliative Care Education Trial: A Qualitative Study of Experiences With Self-Directed and Facilitated Modalities.Journal of palliative care · 2026Trial
- Enabling and hindering aspects of the i²TransHealth e-health intervention for transgender and gender diverse people in Germany: a qualitative process evaluation.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Comparison between two asynchronous teaching methods in an undergraduate dental course: a pilot study.BMC medical education · 2022Trial
- Effectiveness of social giving on the engagement of pharmacy professionals with a computer-based education platform: a pilot randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2022Trial
- Evaluation of class participation in non-face-to-face CPR training for medical students.PloS one · 2022Trial
- Nursing students' evaluation of a gamified public health educational webinar: A comparative pilot study.Nursing open · 2021Trial
- Evaluation of a Novel e-Learning Program for Physiotherapists to Manage Knee Osteoarthritis via Telehealth: Qualitative Study Nested in the PEAK (Physiotherapy Exercise and Physical Activity for Knee Osteoarthritis) Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, much attention has been given to e-learning in higher education as it provides better access to learning resources online, utilising technology - regardless of learners' geographical locations and timescale - to enhance learning. It has now become part of the mainstream in education in the health sciences, including medical, dental, public health, nursing, and other allied health professionals. Despite growing evidence claiming that e-learning is as effective as traditional means of learning, there is very limited evidence available about what works, and when and how e-learning enhances teaching and learning. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education (el-HSE) that have been reported in the medical literature.
methodsA systemic review of articles published on e-learning in health sciences education (el-HSE) was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied & Complementary Medicine, DH-DATA, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Global Health, from 1980 through 2019, using 'Textword' and 'Thesaurus' search terms. All original articles fulfilling the following criteria were included: (1) e-learning was implemented in health sciences education, and (2) the investigation of the factors - enablers and barriers - about el-HSE related to learning performance or outcomes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, both relevant published and unpublished papers were searched. Data were extracted and quality appraised using QualSyst tools, and synthesised performing thematic analysis.
resultsOut of 985 records identified, a total of 162 citations were screened, of which 57 were found to be of relevance to this study. The primary evidence base comprises 24 papers, with two broad categories identified, enablers and barriers, under eight separate themes: facilitate learning; learning in practice; systematic approach to learning; integration of e-learning into curricula; poor motivation and expectation; resource-intensive; not suitable for all disciplines or contents, and lack of IT skills.
conclusionsThis study has identified the factors which impact on e-learning: interaction and collaboration between learners and facilitators; considering learners' motivation and expectations; utilising user-friendly technology; and putting learners at the centre of pedagogy. There is significant scope for better understanding of the issues related to enablers and facilitators associated with e-learning, and developing appropriate policies and initiatives to establish when, how and where they fit best, creating a broader framework for making e-learning effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.