Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32228553›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Cumulative lifetime violence severity scale: development and initial testing among men.

Kelly Scott-Storey, Sue O'Donnell, Judith Wuest, Judith MacIntosh, Marilyn Merritt-Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelly Scott-StoreyUniversity of New Brunswick, Faculty of Nursing, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada. kscottst@unb.ca.
Sue O'DonnellUniversity of New Brunswick, Faculty of Nursing, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada.
Judith WuestUniversity of New Brunswick, Faculty of Nursing, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada.
Judith MacIntoshUniversity of New Brunswick, Faculty of Nursing, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada.
Marilyn Merritt-GrayUniversity of New Brunswick, Faculty of Nursing, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada.

Funding

CIHR #136901New Brunswick Health Research Foundation (CA) #2013-OPER-512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge of the relationship between men's health and violence is flawed by narrow and faulty conceptualization and measurement of violence that often results in attribution of health problems to one form or type of violence without consideration of other exposures. Our purpose is to describe the development and initial testing of the Cumulative Lifetime Violence Severity scale designed for use in health research to measure men's perceptions of the severity of their cumulative lifetime violence.

methodsWe framed the dimensions of violence severity as: type (physical, psychological, sexual), timing (childhood, adulthood), focus (perpetrator, target), context, frequency, and degree of distress. Items reflecting these dimensions were vetted by local experts including individuals who identified as men, with particular attention to meaningful language for men. The measure was pretested, revised to 64 items, and tested for test-retest reliability prior to use in a study of 685 English-speaking Eastern Canadian men, ages 19 to 65 years. We used Principal Components Analysis to illuminate the underlying dimensionality of the items.

resultsPrincipal Components Analysis yielded a 44-item 11 component solution that accounted for 64.06% of variance with good model fit and a Cronbach's alpha of .92. All dimensions of our conceptualization of violence severity were reflected in the components, except Adult Target Sexual Violence. Convergent validity between the Cumulative Lifetime Violence Severity-44 Scale and a global lifetime violence rating scale was r = .750 (p < .001) and concurrent validity was moderate and significant between the Cumulative Lifetime Violence Severity-44 scale and measures of mental health problems commonly experienced by people with violence histories.

conclusionsThe Cumulative Lifetime Violence Severity-44 scale shows promise as the first comprehensive measure of cumulative lifetime violence for health research that considers gender, individual distress and experiences as both perpetrator and target. Next steps include further exploratory analysis with a more diverse sample of men and confirmatory factor analysis.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAgedCanadaExposure to ViolenceHumansMaleMenMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultCumulative lifetime violence severityHealthMenScale development

Identifiers

PMID32228553
PMCPMC7106715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.