Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32228537›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Breast cancer incidence and mammography screening among resettlers in Germany.

Simone Kaucher, Laura Khil, Hiltraud Kajüter, Heiko Becher, Maren Reder, Petra Kolip, Jacob Spallek, Volker Winkler, Eva-Maria Berens

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Health Status and Healthcare Utilization of Ethnic Germans in Russia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Simone KaucherUnit of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Institute of Global Health, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. simone.kaucher@uni-heidelberg.de.
Laura KhilFederal Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bochum, Germany.
Hiltraud KajüterFederal Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Bochum, Germany.
Heiko BecherUnit of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Institute of Global Health, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maren RederInstitute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany.
Petra KolipDepartment of Prevention and Health Promotion, Bielefeld School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Jacob SpallekDepartment of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology, Senftenberg, Germany.
Volker WinklerUnit of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Institute of Global Health, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva-Maria BerensDepartment of Health Services Research and Nursing Science, Bielefeld School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bielefeld University · DEHeidelberg University · DEBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

Federal Ministry of Health NKP-332-028German Cancer Aid 111232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEuropean studies showed that women with a migration background are less likely to participate in mammography screenings than autochthonous women. However, the participation in the German mammography screening programme (MSP) among ethnic German migrants from countries of the former Soviet Union (called resettlers) is unclear so far. The aim of this study was to identify possible differences regarding MSP participation between resettlers from the FSU and the general German population.

methodsData from two independent, complementary studies from North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (a retrospective cohort study 1994-2013; a cross-sectional study 2013/14) were used for comparisons between resettlers and the general population: Odds Ratios (ORs) for MSP participation utilizing the cross-sectional data and time trends of breast cancer incidence rates as well as Chi-Square tests for breast cancer stages utilizing the cohort data.

resultsResettlers showed higher Odds to participate in the MSP than the general population (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.08-5.42). Among resettlers, a large increase in incidence rates was observed during the MSP implementation (2005-2009), resulting in stable and comparable incidence rates after the implementation. Furthermore, pre-MSP implementation, the proportion of advanced breast cancer stages was higher among resettlers than in the German population, post-MSP implementation the proportion was comparable.

conclusionsMSP participating seems surprisingly high among resettlers. An explanation for the increased willingness to participate might be the structured invitation procedure of the MSP. However, the exact reasons remain unclear and future research is needed to confirm this hypothesis and rule out the possibility of selection bias in the cross-sectional study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMammographyMiddle AgedOdds RatioPatient Acceptance of Health CareRegistriesBreast cancerMammography screening programmeMigrantsParticipationResettlersStage at diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID32228537
PMCPMC7106878
OpenAlexW3013926222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.