Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32228483›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: an illustration using CD4 count and mortality in a cohort of patients initiated on antiretroviral therapy.

Nobuhle N Mchunu, Henry G Mwambi, Tarylee Reddy, Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma, Kogieleum Naidoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Joint modeling of longitudinal CD4 count data and time to first occurrence of composite outcome.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nobuhle N MchunuBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), SAMRC Building, 491 Peter Mokaba Ridge Road, Durban, 4041, South Africa. Nobuhle.mchunu@mrc.ac.za.
Henry G MwambiUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, King Edward Avenue, Pietermaritzburg, 3209, South Africa.
Tarylee ReddyBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), SAMRC Building, 491 Peter Mokaba Ridge Road, Durban, 4041, South Africa.
Nonhlanhla Yende-ZumaCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban, 4041, South Africa.
Kogieleum NaidooCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban, 4041, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModelling of longitudinal biomarkers and time-to-event data are important to monitor disease progression. However, these two variables are traditionally analyzed separately or time-varying Cox models are used. The former strategy fails to recognize the shared random-effects from the two processes while the latter assumes that longitudinal biomarkers are exogenous covariates, resulting in inefficient or biased estimates for the time-to-event model. Therefore, we used joint modelling for longitudinal and time-to-event data to assess the effect of longitudinal CD4 count on mortality.

methodsWe studied 4014 patients from the Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) who initiated ART between June 2004 and August 2013. We used proportional hazards regression model to assess the effect of baseline characteristics (excluding CD4 count) on mortality, and linear mixed effect models to evaluate the effect of baseline characteristics on the CD4 count evolution over time. Thereafter, the two analytical approaches were amalgamated to form an advanced joint model for studying the effect of longitudinal CD4 count on mortality. To illustrate the virtues of the joint model, the results from the joint model were compared to those from the time-varying Cox model.

resultsUsing joint modelling, we found that lower CD4 count over time was associated with a 1.3-fold increase in the risk of death, (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.27-1.42). Whereas, results from the time-varying Cox model showed lower CD4 count over time was associated with a 1.2-fold increase in the risk of death, (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.12-1.23).

conclusionsJoint modelling enabled the assessment of the effect of longitudinal CD4 count on mortality while correcting for shared random effects between longitudinal and time-to-event models. In the era of universal test and treat, the evaluation of CD4 count is still crucial for guiding the initiation and discontinuation of opportunistic infections prophylaxis and assessment of late presenting patients. CD4 count can also be used when immunological failure is suspected as we have shown that it is associated with mortality.

Indexed as

CD4 Lymphocyte CountAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-HIV AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsSouth AfricaYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsBiasCD4 countJoint modelsLongitudinal dataMortalityTime-to-event data

Identifiers

PMID32228483
PMCPMC7106785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.